Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #59422

Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi?

From Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.cyberchicken
Subject Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi?
Date 2016-07-07 14:26 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <Z9uFj8LMilfXFwP4@btinternet.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <nlhpud$sgh$38@dont-email.me> <op.yj5p90n4gv88my@desktop-gjfvnuo.tony> <727fz.17776$kn7.17069@fx19.iad> <0F4ONVEU1efXFwZf@btinternet.com> <qeqfz.23$y32.1@fx02.iad>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In message <qeqfz.23$y32.1@fx02.iad>, BBB DoW #14 
<r0llinThru@none.invalid> writes
>Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>//
>>I actually read that.  And for the shear hell of it I'm gonna reply.
>>People in this newsgroup like to pin labels on people ... such and such
>>is a kook or behaving kookily.
>
>errr... not-so-much "labels" more like behavioral separation.
>And it is everywhere in Usenet froups - some members taking the radical
>step of kill-files in avoiding contact. It is quite usual to find that
>'strategy' does not work with the full blown oxygen wasting k00k.
>Derbyshire being an example which is right in yer face in the Topic :-/
>So forget your insinuation AUK is different in *that* way.

Oh I realise that.  My personal approach is to try to treat everyone I 
meet with respect.  It doesn't always work but personally I don't wait 
until somebody earns my respect.  Very few people will want to do that 
anyway ... probably because they don't think I'm worth it.  But anyway I 
find that few people want to get in my face ... possibly because I have 
no desire to get in theres and I look sufficiently imposing for people 
not to risk it.  Checkmate wants to stay away from me ... and he is 
probably the person I am on least good terms with. I suppose that is a 
form of respect.

>
>>But in real life away from Usenet it is a phrase you hardly ever hear.
>>People in real life do not dedicate their waking hours to pursuing kooks
>>or calling people kooks.
>>
>no..??.. well we(tinw) are yet to establish your actual world view
>dependant on your locale buuut I can tell you quite confidently in my
>travels through Europe, Africa, the US and many parts of Micronesia there
>is definitely social segregation of ...let's say,, "the cerebrally
>ignoble".

Sure ... I usually end up talking to people like that ... but it isn't 
always enjoyable.  All some people like that want is someone to talk to. 
And sadly they don't get it.


>In my part of Aussie that group is labeled "hoppys",, as in being separate
>to loonies and spastics. True,, one does not bother with "pursuing" such
>specimens buuut one does avoid them like the plague. Life is too short to
>be held up listening to manic rants on topics one really only requires a
>broad knowledge of to form an opinion.. hoppys dedicate every waking hour
>to microexamination of their particular bent.

Well some people are better off than others.  I don't much like social 
situations with strangers.  But I'm sure we all have our quirks and 
idiosyncrasies.

I think the thing about groups like AUK is some people try to make 
things worse for others who are perceived as different or defective. 
Well my response to that is none of us is perfect and most people are 
far from perfect.

>Yours being some imagined authority on gold movements.. heh[smirk]

Ha ha.  Well enough on that subject (almost).  I am invested in a gold 
mining company called Randgold who have several goldmines in the Sahara. 
I bought some shares and the price went down.  Then on the day of Brexit 
they shot up so 2 days later I sold them.  They dithered and I almost 
rebought them at a lower price.  Then they shot up again almost as far 
as they had after Brexit leaving me way behind.  Yesterday I bought back 
in after a week of rising prices each day, in which I expected them to 
come down again.  There is no telling where they will end up but I think 
they may be at their height now.  Mind you I thought that every day last 
week. They came down a bit today so I hope they don't screw me over 
again now I have bought back.  All it will take is bad jobs figures for 
the USA tomorrow and I should be making some sort of profit again. Sorry 
... it is imagined authority as nobody knows what will happen and most 
of the predictions so far have been way off.
>
>>Kooks are purely a USENET invention to further break people apart and
>>separate us into an us and them situation.  The fact that hardly anyone
>>can agree as to who is a kook and who is not is further evidence of the
>>superficiality of this distinction.
>>
>when you insist on asking/accepting guidance from a k00k what else can
>you expect as a   v a c a n t   space in yer education..?
>You really believe said k00k(s) find AUK all by themselves?

As I said I think "kook" is a convenient label for someone who doesn't 
fit on.  That is all of us under appropriate criteria.

>In my whole recollection there is not a single k00k today posting in AUK
>who was not dragged here frothin' and foamin' in demented indignation.
>gweggles and Duurbs being fine examples of that recruitment.
>Th0.. I qualify the result in gweggles case as that dude is is just a very
>malcontent malicious tr0LLr.

I suppose this place does attract people who are very different.  But if 
everyone is very different then how can you say somebody doesn't fit in?
>
>>Personally I am a unifier.
>>
>"Personally" yer a wholly certifiable phuckup IF you truly believe that.
I didn't say I was capable of it.  It is what I believe in. A little 
kindness never hurt anyone.
>
>"k00k" does not quite fit your work.. I am persuaded to
>accept yer more representative of those skitzoid types found in the
>*.depression  *.welfare  type froups.
>IMO OMMV
>
>>  Therefore I propose that the whole idea of kooks in AUK be scrapped and
>>a more realistic real world picture be adopted.
>>
>just for your ...errr, 'benefit' I reiterate what was posted as a guide.
>
>       #Not to be assimilated/confused with tr0LLs,, the
>       #k00k is wholly focused on their view being the only
>       #"correct" outlook.
>       #They are never wrong and someone should do something
>       #about (whatever) being wrong.
>
>>There isn't even a good definition of what a kook is ... is there?
>
> "good" is subjective.
>identifying and corralling a k00k is always evidential.
>albeit the specimen supplies the evidence voluntarily and alone... no
>'help' required.
Well it is evidence that I am blind to in that case.
>
>make an effort to be objective and rank yourself.
> - your view is k00k is not defined (despite evidence to the contrary)
>- you propose k00k be abolished (yet offer no alternative
>                                       solution for froups)
> - you refuse to provide evidence for your statements (you wont be told)
> - you bait and switch on posters for your amusement (and whine when
>                                                               bettered)
>... what's the chance you are indeed a k00k?
>
>jes FTR...
>as with that "Ellis Dee" sock I gave the topic a shot in all seriousness.
>It is my preference not to suffer fools... so I extend to you that same
>courtesy I allowed "Ellis Dee"... think before you hit "followup-to".
>I do not do "second chance" :/
Fools are a fact of life.  Where you going to go to escape them ... 
Mars?
>
>also FTR... I posted the cmsg for AUK not so long back.
>IF that does not tell you I have been part of AUK operations since the
>beginning then you do prove ownership of   v a c a n t   space.
>I am not "in" AUK as such... through arrangement and help from those
>willing AUK "good guys" I am able to operate remotely.
>Largely it has always been that way, an exception is the period immediately
>following the Novins k00s00t whereon I did run personas in AUK,, as is the
>accepted practice for that froup.
>
>end of....
>
>

I don't know who are the "good guys" and who aren't.
-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley

Janitor's BFF #4
#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-06 22:43 +1000
  Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:21 +0000
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:24 +0000
  Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 06:49 +0100
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 06:14 -0500
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 05:53 -0700
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 17:18 +0100
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:48 +0000
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 14:26 +0100
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 00:37 +1000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 16:13 +0100
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:58 +0000
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:14 +1000
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:24 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 21:26 +1000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 15:21 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 20:07 +0000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? The Inconvenient Truth <trvth@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-07 18:37 +0000
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:55 +0000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:36 +0100
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:55 +0100
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-12 20:06 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-13 09:18 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-13 12:40 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-13 23:35 +1000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-14 06:44 +0100
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:11 +1000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:27 +0100
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-07 12:33 -0400
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-08 06:03 +0200
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-08 02:23 -0600
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 07:46 +0200
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 10:45 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:13 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 07:00 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 00:07 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:24 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 20:47 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 06:09 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 07:05 +0200
          Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 19:27 +0000
            Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 06:41 +0200
              Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:14 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 13:33 -0700
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 22:33 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 15:36 -0600
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:59 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.gamy> - 2016-07-10 01:12 -0500
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "LOL TerribleTard" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 09:30 +0200
                Re: look how i made him flip out again. Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-10 03:53 -0600
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 22:34 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:49 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.pelt> - 2016-07-09 21:17 -0500
                Re: Nads Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:22 -0600
                Re: Nads Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 02:37 +0000
                Re: Nads Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:45 -0600
                Re: Nads "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 19:49 -0700
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:35 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.bum> - 2016-07-10 01:11 -0500
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:43 +0200
              Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:25 +1000
      Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:47 +0000
        Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 13:45 -0700
          Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-07 14:49 -0600
          [bullshit redact] woz -- * love Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:18 +1000
        Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-07-12 13:49 +0100
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-07 05:56 -0700
  Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:32 +1000
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 05:30 -0700

csiph-web