Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #59456

Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi?

From Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.cyberchicken
Subject Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi?
Date 2016-07-07 19:47 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nlmbkv$ghj$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <nlhpud$sgh$38@dont-email.me> <op.yj5p90n4gv88my@desktop-gjfvnuo.tony> <727fz.17776$kn7.17069@fx19.iad> <0F4ONVEU1efXFwZf@btinternet.com> <qeqfz.23$y32.1@fx02.iad>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 20:33:51 +1000, BBB DoW #14 (Pie Gurl) PiG@yahoo.com 
WINNER - Kook of the Year 2012 wrote:

> Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>I actually read that.  And for the shear hell of it I'm gonna reply.
>>People in this newsgroup like to pin labels on people ... such and such
>>is a kook or behaving kookily.
> 
> errr... not-so-much "labels" more like behavioral separation. And it is
> everywhere in Usenet froups - some members taking the radical step of
> kill-files in avoiding contact. It is quite usual to find that
> 'strategy' does not work with the full blown oxygen wasting k00k.
> Derbyshire being an example which is right in yer face in the Topic :-/
> So forget your insinuation AUK is different in *that* way.

You really do see this "Derbyshire" *everywhere*, don't you, kook?

>>But in real life away from Usenet it is a phrase you hardly ever hear.
>>People in real life do not dedicate their waking hours to pursuing kooks
>>or calling people kooks.
>
> no..??.. well we(tinw) are yet to establish your actual world view
> dependant on your locale buuut I can tell you quite confidently in my
> travels through Europe, Africa, the US and many parts of Micronesia
> there is definitely social segregation of ...let's say,, "the cerebrally
> ignoble".

That being why you're pining away for your one and only ever slurper, the 
absentee Tr!pe.

SPNAK!

> In my part of Aussie that group is labeled "hoppys",, as in being
> separate to loonies and spastics.

You, of course, being all three in one.

> True,, one does not bother with "pursuing" such specimens buuut one
> does avoid them like the plague.

You, of course, having raised morphing to escape killfiles to a high art 
as a direct consequence.

> Life is too short to be held up listening to manic rants on topics

like your imaginary foe Derbyshire?

SPNAK!

> hoppys dedicate every waking hour to microexamination of their
> particular bent.

For instance, microexamination of every post that their paranoia makes 
them think came from Derbyshire?

SPNAK!

> Yours being some imagined authority on gold movements.. heh[smirk]

Imaginary authority on purported Derbyshire socks seems more salient in 
the current context.

>>Kooks are purely a USENET invention to further break people apart and
>>separate us into an us and them situation.  The fact that hardly anyone
>>can agree as to who is a kook and who is not is further evidence of the
>>superficiality of this distinction.
>
> when you insist on asking/accepting guidance from a k00k what else can
> you expect as a   v a c a n t   space in yer education..?

Anyone accepting guidance from *you* tends to end up with a vacant space 
in their cranium. Your barely-legible screed has been proven toxic to 
brain cells in any significant dose, hence why I often snip most of it in 
reply.

> You really believe said k00k(s) find AUK all by themselves?

Of course not. For example, you were drawn into AUK by kensi, a few years 
back, for which the rest of Usenet owes her a huge debt of gratitude.

> In my whole recollection there is not a single k00k today posting in
> AUK who was not dragged here frothin' and foamin' in demented
> indignation.

Now why does the phrase "I just do not fskn believe!!" immediately spring 
to mind when I read the phrase "frothin' and foamin' in demented 
indignation"?

<snicker>

> gweggles and Duurbs being fine examples of that recruitment.

"Duurbs", of course, being your twisted projection onto various innocent 
usenetters of the man you see in the mirror, kook.

> Th0.. I qualify the result in gweggles case as that dude is is just a
> very malcontent malicious tr0LLr.

Oh, he's very definitely also a kook, and also fairly mediocre at 
trolling. He's much like you in some ways!

>>Personally I am a unifier.
>
> "Personally" yer a wholly certifiable phuckup IF you truly believe that.

To a wholly certifiable phuckup, I guess everyone else look like wholly 
certifiable phuckups.

<snicker>

> "k00k" does not quite fit your work.. I am persuaded to accept yer more
> representative of those skitzoid types found in the *.depression 
> *.welfare  type froups. IMO OMMV

Right-wing political screed noted. I'll refer you to the quadraSPNAK I 
just slapped Fakey McKookTard with: <nljmpe$9fb$2@dont-email.me>

>>  Therefore I propose that the whole idea of kooks in AUK be scrapped
>>  and a more realistic real world picture be adopted.
>
> just for your ...errr, 'benefit' I reiterate what was posted as a guide.
> 
> 	#Not to be assimilated/confused with tr0LLs,, the #k00k is wholly
> 	focused on their view being the only #"correct" outlook.
> 	#They are never wrong and someone should do something #about
>       (whatever) being wrong.

This from the guy with a long history of saying "Kick him off usenet! 
He's Derbyshire! HE'S DERBYSHIRE, I TELL YOU! WHY WON'T ANYBODY BELIEVE 
ME?!?!?!?! I JUST DON'T FSKN BELIEVE ... !"

<snicker>

>>There isn't even a good definition of what a kook is ... is there?

As with most diseases, one must go by symptomology.

http://www.woodmann.com/searchlores/way_kook.htm

You, murphy, read this and apparently mistook it for an instruction 
manual, or perhaps even the Bible or something. Nearly everything in 
there seems to fit your own Usenet activities to a T.

>  "good" is subjective.
> identifying and corralling a k00k is always evidential. albeit the
> specimen supplies the evidence voluntarily and alone... no 'help'
> required.

Nope, even without pointy-stick application you will spontaneously froth 
about Derbyshire. Often all it takes to set you off is for a noob to ask 
a question in afn, you paranoid wackjob.

> make an effort to be objective and rank yourself.
>  - your view is k00k is not defined (despite evidence to the contrary)
> - you propose k00k be abolished (yet offer no alternative
> 					solution for froups)
>  - you refuse to provide evidence for your statements (you wont be told)
>  - you bait and switch on posters for your amusement (and whine when
> 							 	bettered)
> ... what's the chance you are indeed a k00k?

You ought to be asking yourself that question. And then rethinking the 
entire last 15 or so years of your life.

> jes FTR...
> as with that "Ellis Dee" sock

There's that paranoia again!

> I gave the topic a shot in all seriousness. It is my preference not to
> suffer fools...

How you put up with yourself is a deep and abiding mystery.

> so I extend to you that same courtesy I allowed "Ellis Dee"... think
> before you hit "followup-to". I do not do "second chance" :/

You do not do "first chance". Anyone who doesn't slurp you you ignore at 
best, and often start frothing at them and accusing them of being 
Derbyshire. You're incapable of establishing any kind of normal 
relationship due to your paranoid fixation on, and terror of, that 
net.dead ghost.

> also FTR... I posted the cmsg for AUK not so long back. IF that does not
> tell you I have been part of AUK operations since the beginning

Anyone can find that with google, you nitwit. You were drawn to AUK by 
kensi back around 2011/2012. Not long after, even Ferd's *fake* award 
show nailed you with a Pickett for outerfilthing Derbyshire, and of 
course the *real* FNVW and voters threw the proverbial book at you. Goofy 
Azzed Babboon, Looney Maroon, multiple KotMs, a Pickett, a Custer, Coward 
of the Month, multiple CNotMs, a stint as the Kooki Information Minister, 
and eventually Kook of the Year. You melted down and took a very lengthy 
sabbatical, recently started screeding heavily again, have once again 
been sucked into heavy participation in AUK (this time by me), and have 
managed to score *another* two Clueless Newbie of the Month Awards and a 
smattering of other stuff, plus the office of Palm Sunday Preacher.

> then you do prove ownership of   v a c a n t   space.

That would be his rent-free holdings in your vacant cranium. Not as 
extensive as mine or kensi's, let alone Derbyshire's, but non-negligible.

<snicker>

> I am not "in" AUK as such...

sez the kook who has been posting an average of 3 articles per hour to 
AUK for several days in a row now.

<snicker>

> through arrangement and help from those willing AUK "good guys"

I.e., through mine and kensi's artful application of pointy sticks to 
keep you spinning and frothing.

<snicker>

> I am able to operate remotely. Largely it has always been that way, an
> exception is the period immediately following the Novins k00s00t whereon
> I did run personas in AUK,, as is the accepted practice for that froup.
> 
> end of....

We've heard "end of...." from you before, kook. Didn't you recently win a 
Sidaway for one of your multiple past pronouncements of your intent to 
leave Usenet forever because you were butthurt over losing an argument?

<snicker>

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-06 22:43 +1000
  Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:21 +0000
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:24 +0000
  Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 06:49 +0100
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:33 +1000
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 06:14 -0500
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 05:53 -0700
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:39 +0100
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 17:18 +0100
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:48 +0000
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 14:26 +0100
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 00:37 +1000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-07 16:13 +0100
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:58 +0000
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:14 +1000
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:24 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 21:26 +1000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 15:21 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 20:07 +0000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? The Inconvenient Truth <trvth@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-07 18:37 +0000
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:55 +0000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:36 +0100
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-12 11:55 +0100
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-12 20:06 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-13 09:18 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-13 12:40 +0100
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-13 23:35 +1000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-14 06:44 +0100
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:11 +1000
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Bill Jillians <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-08 10:27 +0100
      Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-07 12:33 -0400
        Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-08 06:03 +0200
          Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-08 02:23 -0600
            Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 07:46 +0200
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 10:45 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:13 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 07:00 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 00:07 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:24 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 20:47 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 06:09 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 07:05 +0200
          Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-08 19:27 +0000
            Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 06:41 +0200
              Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:14 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 13:33 -0700
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-09 22:33 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 15:36 -0600
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:59 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.gamy> - 2016-07-10 01:12 -0500
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "LOL TerribleTard" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 09:30 +0200
                Re: look how i made him flip out again. Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-10 03:53 -0600
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 22:34 +0000
                Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:49 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.pelt> - 2016-07-09 21:17 -0500
                Re: Nads Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:22 -0600
                Re: Nads Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-10 02:37 +0000
                Re: Nads Skeeter DoW #420 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-09 20:45 -0600
                Re: Nads "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-09 19:49 -0700
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:35 +0200
                Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx.bum> - 2016-07-10 01:11 -0500
              Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-10 05:43 +0200
              Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:25 +1000
      Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-07 19:47 +0000
        Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 13:45 -0700
          Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? Skeeter DoW #8 <skt@skt.invalid> - 2016-07-07 14:49 -0600
          [bullshit redact] woz -- * love Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-08 13:18 +1000
        Re: Why does everyone love Nads and Kensi? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-07-12 13:49 +0100
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-07-07 05:56 -0700
  Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-07 20:32 +1000
    Re: Why does everyone hate Nads and Kensi? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-07 05:30 -0700

csiph-web