Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #586039

Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/21/2016 12:58 PM, john wrote:
> Hawking is probably on an Ensure
> diet by now- plant and whey.
> Since the whey has no complex
> animal fats, he'll be arrested.
>
> Do neurons regrow?
> "For almost one hundred years, it has been a mantra of biology - brain cells
> do not regenerate. In a startling discovery made in the late 1990s, researchers
> at Princeton University found that new neurons were continually being added to
> the brains of adult monkeys. The neurons were added to the cerebral cortex of
> the brain." from
> http://biology.about.com/od/Brain/p/Regeneration-Of-Brain-Cells.htm
>

John, you have waffled back and forth all day on this now.
You've said you can cure ALS by diet and would be able to get Hawking 
out of his chair.
Then you've said dead neurons are dead neurons and there's no recovery.
Then you've said that new neurons can be grown.

Maybe if you settled on what you wanted to say before you said it.....

By the way, how Hawking is fed can be looked up, and it's not an Ensure 
diet. But then again, maybe you don't care to look things up before 
opening your yap about things you know little to nothing about.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 19:56 -0500
  Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 19:47 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-11 23:13 -0500
      units of the secondpower of the speed of light noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 13:44 -0700
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-12 13:14 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 15:08 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 17:24 -0500
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 15:50 -0700
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-16 16:57 -0400
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 16:56 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-20 01:44 -0400
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 01:02 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-30 01:58 -0400
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 20:04 -0700
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-20 12:11 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 12:20 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-20 19:46 +0000
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:56 -0500
            Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:19 -0700
              Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:37 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 06:46 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:58 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 07:14 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 09:23 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 14:57 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:28 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 15:54 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:38 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 17:21 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 10:58 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 13:26 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:38 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 13:58 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 12:05 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:19 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 20:29 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:23 -0700
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:55 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 16:22 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 18:27 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 17:24 -0700

csiph-web