Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular
Date	2016-06-21 20:29 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<nkc835$hq7$3@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <ac258b7c-1595-4604-bffc-401957016f9c@googlegroups.com> <nkbkla$7g6$2@pcls7.std.com> <c277ad8a-7684-4a85-9159-a3ff6e560574@googlegroups.com> <nkbt34$u5s$1@pcls7.std.com> <3800b8f4-77ad-4e6b-8d01-3dd442b75059@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Do neurons regrow?
>"For almost one hundred years, it has been a mantra of biology - brain cells
>do not regenerate. In a startling discovery made in the late 1990s, 
>researchers at Princeton University found that new neurons were 
>continually being added to the brains of adult monkeys. The neurons were 
>added to the cerebral cortex of the brain."

Yes, that science you hate so much is making progress.  Perhaps this hated
science can help sufferers of ALS some day, or at least halt its progress.

Thread

Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 19:56 -0500
  Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 19:47 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-11 23:13 -0500
      units of the secondpower of the speed of light noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 13:44 -0700
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-12 13:14 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 15:08 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 17:24 -0500
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 15:50 -0700
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-16 16:57 -0400
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 16:56 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-20 01:44 -0400
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 01:02 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-30 01:58 -0400
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 20:04 -0700
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-20 12:11 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 12:20 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-20 19:46 +0000
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:56 -0500
            Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:19 -0700
              Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:37 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 06:46 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:58 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 07:14 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 09:23 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 14:57 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:28 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 15:54 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:38 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 17:21 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 10:58 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 13:26 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:38 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 13:58 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 12:05 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:19 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 20:29 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:23 -0700
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:55 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 16:22 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 18:27 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 17:24 -0700

csiph-web