Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #586029

Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular
Date 2016-06-21 17:21 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <nkbt34$u5s$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <f19c45b1-5238-4cfd-bf4b-44ca7d623ebf@googlegroups.com> <nkbfub$pdv$2@gioia.aioe.org> <ac258b7c-1595-4604-bffc-401957016f9c@googlegroups.com> <nkbkla$7g6$2@pcls7.std.com> <c277ad8a-7684-4a85-9159-a3ff6e560574@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/21/2016 10:28 AM, john wrote:
> Michael
> Dead neurons are dead neurons.
> Paras don't ever get out of their
> chair, either.

Make up your mind.  Either:

1: You can get Hawking out of his chair if only you could feed him a vegan
diet;

or 2: Dead neurons are dead neurons. 

Which one?

(Hawking probably cannot swallow, his diet is certainly extremely tightly
controlled)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 19:56 -0500
  Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 19:47 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-11 23:13 -0500
      units of the secondpower of the speed of light noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 13:44 -0700
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-12 13:14 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 15:08 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 17:24 -0500
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 15:50 -0700
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-16 16:57 -0400
  Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 16:56 -0700
    Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-20 01:44 -0400
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 01:02 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-06-30 01:58 -0400
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 20:04 -0700
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-20 12:11 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 12:20 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-20 19:46 +0000
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:56 -0500
            Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:19 -0700
              Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:37 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 06:46 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:58 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 07:14 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 09:23 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 14:57 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:28 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 15:54 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:38 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 17:21 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 10:58 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 13:26 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:38 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 13:58 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 12:05 -0700
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:19 -0500
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 20:29 +0000
                Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:23 -0700
      Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 15:55 -0700
        Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 16:22 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 18:27 -0700
          Re: Hawking radiation is corpuscular "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 17:24 -0700

csiph-web