Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #585855

Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation
Date 2016-06-20 19:30 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <nk9g9b$eeh$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <41ddc590-d631-4c9c-901c-7282ccafcc5f@googlegroups.com> <ef989697-720d-4e30-ad69-8c9d986d4daa@googlegroups.com> <e10c7e6e-b0ba-4040-86e4-42e8153dcb7f@googlegroups.com> <nk7ctc$eq9$1@pcls7.std.com> <703847ff-e15c-4786-9d02-73ee96c77669@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>Protons on the other side of the
>Universe are the same size as ours.
>So what?

It would be expected if the laws of physics are the same everywhere.

I ask you: What does it matter if two ratios are within an order of
magnitude of each other?  Especially when they are not, because of the
incorrect sizes you used?  And wtf is the rotation period of the Milky Way
when it doesn't even rotate as a solid unit? (What is the rotation period of
our own solar system?!?!?) And where TF did you get that "rotation period of
an atom" from?  So, of the four numbers, two are incorrect, and two are
meaningless.

If I roll two dice and get an "8", then I roll two other dice and also
get an "8", did the first roll result cause the second? After all, they are 
the exact same value!!! 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Time Must Have a Universe Equation "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 16:33 -0700
  Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation trudi.schwander@gmail.com - 2016-06-19 03:22 -0700
    Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 12:15 -0700
      Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-20 00:21 +0000
        Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 06:44 -0700
          Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-20 19:30 +0000
            Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 16:24 -0700
              Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 01:54 +0000
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:55 -0700
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 12:35 -0700
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-21 20:26 +0000
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 16:30 -0700
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 18:13 -0700
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-22 15:43 +0000
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 10:33 -0700
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-22 18:53 +0000
                Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-22 15:29 +0000
      Re: Time Must Have a Universe Equation "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 12:49 -0700

csiph-web