Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #575123

Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/2/2016 5:11 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 1:13:06 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 5/1/2016 11:17 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>> On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 5:07:50 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>> (snipped)
>>>> Sam Wormley certainly cannot prove that Geothermal is superior to Solar, because the
>>>> literature rarely talks about geothermal and Sam can only post that which is in the
>>>> literature, not having a physics mind for himself.
>>>>
>>>> AP
>>>
>>> Odd could not prove the superiority of Solar over Geothermal which was his position.
>>
>> The proof is in the deployment, which for solar is a lot broader than
>> geothermal. If it were inferior by a factor of 5000 as you claimed, then
>> geothermal would be in use 5000 times more than solar. Since this is
>> obviously not the case, then you are missing something.
>>
>
> What a joke, so you believe the commercial use of something makes it superior over
> something else which is not so widespread commercially.

I believe that if process A is 5000 times more efficient that process B, 
then companies are going to jump all over process A, because it is more 
cost-effective to do so. To be able to provide the same product for 5000 
times less cost is something that any commercial venture seeks to do.

>
> If you were at least 1/10 of a science mind, your argument would have been that Solar
> requires a land mass area of 5,000 times larger to collect enough solar energy to match
> the land mass of the Power Station of The Geysers in California.

Are you QUITE SURE of that? Has this been supported by facts? As you 
know, there are existing solar power facilities with KNOWN acreage and 
KNOWN power output. There are existing geothermal power facilities with 
KNOWN acreage and KNOWN power output. So let's see if your analysis with 
a radiation power law is actually supported with facts. What would you 
say if the FACTS do not support your logic?

> But you are not, you
> are not a scientist with a science mind but rather an argumentative dufus in sci.physics.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:27 -0700
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-29 18:04 -0500
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-30 00:50 +0000
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-29 21:39 -0500
      Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-04-29 22:36 -0500
        Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 21:08 -0700
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 21:14 -0700
      Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-30 00:09 -0500
      Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 02:23 -0400
        Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-30 20:26 +0000
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-04-29 23:31 -0700
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:38 -0700
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:34 -0700
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 05:30 -0700
    photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 15:17 -0700
      Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 15:07 -0700
        Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:17 -0700
          Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:13 -0500
            Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 15:11 -0700
              Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 06:49 -0500
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 16:13 -0700
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 15:18 -0700
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 11:48 -0500
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 00:03 -0700
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 08:22 -0500
      Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:49 -0500

csiph-web