Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it
Date	2016-04-30 00:09 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ng1en6$dn$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<870f6caf-41a3-4540-802a-c37493661973@googlegroups.com> <63cdvc-8ni.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <b7f1642a-9db5-4fc3-b37b-c0eb823bb52f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/29/2016 11:14 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Jim Penino said
> I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean
> rock-hard stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface
> of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric
> acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid
> so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole
> different sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid.
> Meta-stupid. Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its
> own Schwarzschild radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense
> and massive that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid.
> Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise
> emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can
> be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial
> fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of
> stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of
> physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
> n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo
> is Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid,
> a grand unified theory of stupid.

> Archie-Poo is the epiphany of stupid. Archie-poo is stooopid.
>
> Archie-Poo is a swine. Archie-Poo is a vulgar little maggot.
> Archie-Poo is a worthless bag of filth. As they say in Texas,
> Archie-Poo couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions printed
> on the heel. Archie-Poo is a canker, an ulcerous sore that won't go
> away. I would rather watch Affirmative Action lawyers suck-start
> Harleys with their bungholes than suffer the troll abominations of
> Archie-Poo.
>
> Uncle Al - 2002
> -------------------
>
> That's worthy of entry into the HVAC Hall Of Insult Fame.
>
> Archived
>

UA is instructing Trump on his acceptance speech right now.

Thread

can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:27 -0700
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-29 18:04 -0500
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-30 00:50 +0000
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-29 21:39 -0500
      Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-04-29 22:36 -0500
        Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 21:08 -0700
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 21:14 -0700
      Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-30 00:09 -0500
      Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 02:23 -0400
        Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-30 20:26 +0000
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-04-29 23:31 -0700
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:38 -0700
  Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:34 -0700
    Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 05:30 -0700
    photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 15:17 -0700
      Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 15:07 -0700
        Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:17 -0700
          Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:13 -0500
            Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 15:11 -0700
              Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 06:49 -0500
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 16:13 -0700
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 15:18 -0700
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 11:48 -0500
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 00:03 -0700
                Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 08:22 -0500
      Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:49 -0500

csiph-web