Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #574269
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it |
| Date | 2016-04-30 00:50 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <63cdvc-8ni.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <870f6caf-41a3-4540-802a-c37493661973@googlegroups.com> |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote: > So the title asks it all. And in this thread, I keep insisting that the science magazines, journals, reporters and news agencies keep maligning geothermal or ignoring geothermal, which makes me suspicious that the oil coal gas companies have "bought out some scientists". > > AP Archie-Poo is a publicly despised Usenet crank and boring argumentative troll. Pull the troll's plug. Archie-Poo is an epiphany of chronic abusive trolling stupidity. Archie-Poo is a snail-skulled little rabbit. I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand unified theory of stupid. Archie-Poo is the epiphany of stupid. Archie-poo is stooopid. Archie-Poo is a swine. Archie-Poo is a vulgar little maggot. Archie-Poo is a worthless bag of filth. As they say in Texas, Archie-Poo couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions printed on the heel. Archie-Poo is a canker, an ulcerous sore that won't go away. I would rather watch Affirmative Action lawyers suck-start Harleys with their bungholes than suffer the troll abominations of Archie-Poo. Uncle Al - 2002 -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:27 -0700
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-29 18:04 -0500
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-30 00:50 +0000
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-29 21:39 -0500
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-04-29 22:36 -0500
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 21:08 -0700
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 21:14 -0700
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-30 00:09 -0500
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 02:23 -0400
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-30 20:26 +0000
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-04-29 23:31 -0700
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:38 -0700
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 23:34 -0700
Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 05:30 -0700
photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 15:17 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 15:07 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:17 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:13 -0500
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 15:11 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 06:49 -0500
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 16:13 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 15:18 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 11:48 -0500
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 00:03 -0700
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 08:22 -0500
Re: photos on iphone frustration galore Re: can anyone in sci.physics prove that Geothermal via Stefan Boltzmann law is 5000 times superior to Solar? I doubt it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:49 -0500
csiph-web