Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #573238

Re: Arguing with lunatics

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Arguing with lunatics
Date 2016-04-25 17:23 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nfm5dk$82m$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <8k42vc-h7b.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <S-KdndWiA-b74IPKnZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com> <nsmdnXK2I8ZcGYPKnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nfm41t$142$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/25/2016 5:04 PM, Bast wrote:
> Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>
>> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not leave "Surviving
>> Corners" at the very bottom to two 110 story buildings but deep
>> underground MRR nukes can.

It is remarkable to me how people like this who know literally nothing 
about building engineering or forensic science can conclude that if a 
building collapsed due to impact, then there would be no "surviving 
corners". People who know nothing would not be able to judge whether 
there should be surviving corners or not. People who rant and foam from 
a position of ignorance deserve to be put on a chain in the backyard 
where dogs customarily bark at nothing.

>>
>> Rocky
> I hope Trump keeps his promise to have a real investigation on 9/11 after
> he's elected.
> When the truth comes out,  a lot of shill posters here will lose their jobs.
>
>
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:53 -0500
  Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:11 +0000
    Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:27 -0500
      Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:37 +0000
        Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 12:58 -0500
          Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:56 +0000
            Re: Arguing with lunatics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 14:45 -0700
              Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 22:46 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:07 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 18:35 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:25 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 20:34 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:57 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:12 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:03 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-01 12:57 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-01 19:39 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 18:04 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 17:23 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 16:50 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 22:41 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:10 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-26 13:13 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 19:06 +0000
              Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:08 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:29 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 14:08 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-25 14:53 -0700
              Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:41 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 12:58 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 12:33 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:56 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 23:29 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 22:42 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-24 00:36 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:10 -0500

csiph-web