Re: Arguing with lunatics

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Arguing with lunatics
Date	2016-04-22 20:56 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<tofquc-phf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<nfbb45$325$1@gioia.aioe.org> <hoonuc-pd6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <8_mdnU_s2_NP2ITKnZ2dnUU7-TXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <votnuc-h07.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <r_6dndLAl8Pp-4fKnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
> news:votnuc-h07.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hoonuc-pd6.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> There are a number of lunatics that post to this group. There are also 
>>>>> a
>>>>> number of people that seem to spend a lot of time trying to reason with
>>>>> lunatics. Lunatics cannot be reasoned with; it's what makes them
>>>>> lunatics.
>>>>
>>>> It is amusing to watch them twist and turn but a bit scary when you
>>>> realize
>>>> they are probably eligible to vote and really scary when you realize 
>>>> they
>>>> are walking around unsupervised.
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because I like seeing the "Lunatics" that can not explain how a
>>> "Global Collapse" as NIST calls it can leave "Surviving Corners" exactly
>>> like a deep underground MRR nuke does.
>>
>> Excellent example of a raving lunatic.
>>
>> Want to see him twist and turn?
>>
>> Just ask him how the explosive energy of a "MRR nuke" is different than
>> any other nuclear divice.
> 
> You are the one running and snipping because the following can not be 

Nope, I am the one waiting for an answer to how the explosive energy
of a "MRR nuke" is different than any other nuclear device.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:53 -0500
  Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:11 +0000
    Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:27 -0500
      Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:37 +0000
        Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 12:58 -0500
          Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:56 +0000
            Re: Arguing with lunatics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 14:45 -0700
              Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 22:46 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:07 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 18:35 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:25 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 20:34 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:57 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:12 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:03 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-01 12:57 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-01 19:39 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 18:04 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 17:23 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 16:50 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 22:41 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:10 +0000
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-26 13:13 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 19:06 +0000
              Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:08 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:29 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 14:08 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-25 14:53 -0700
              Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:41 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 12:58 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 12:33 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:56 -0700
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 23:29 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 22:42 -0500
                Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-24 00:36 -0400
                Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:10 -0500

csiph-web