Re: Arguing with lunatics

From	"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Arguing with lunatics
Date	2016-04-25 18:04 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nfm41t$142$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <7IKdnajACJSAwIPKnZ2dnUU7-THNnZ2d@giganews.com> <8k42vc-h7b.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <S-KdndWiA-b74IPKnZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com> <nsmdnXK2I8ZcGYPKnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:nflv16$gjd$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> This thread is for whether we should argue with lunatics such as
>> yourself, not for actually arguing with lunatics such as yourself.
>
> Obviously you are mistaken because real jets do not leave "Surviving
> Corners" at the very bottom to two 110 story buildings but deep
> underground MRR nukes can.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> And how do you explain how many different images there were of the
> alleged Flight 175 when they should have all been consistent?
>
> You claim a gazillion pounds of debris was found at Ground Zero but you
> still have no explanation for how it could get around the "Surviving
> Corners."  ROTFLMAO
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> From what I see of you and NIST total inability to explain why there
> were "Surviving Corners" to both the Twin Towers makes you and NIST the
> lunatics/fabricators.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky





I hope Trump keeps his promise to have a real investigation on 9/11 after 
he's elected.
When the truth comes out,  a lot of shill posters here will lose their jobs.

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:57 -0500
  Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:12 +0000
    Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:03 -0500
      Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0000
        Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-01 12:57 -0500
          Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-01 19:39 +0000
  Re: Arguing with lunatics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 18:04 -0400

csiph-web