Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.development > #9424
| From | Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.development |
| Subject | Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc |
| Date | 2016-04-10 19:33 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nee2jq$di3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (26 earlier) <nb24dn$41j$1@dont-email.me> <nbq4e3$9c7$2@dont-email.me> <nceppn$v5b$1@dont-email.me> <ndd91g$j0t$3@dont-email.me> <ndo29j$888$1@dont-email.me> |
James Harris schrieb:
> On 29/03/2016 08:01, Bernhard Schornak wrote:
>> James Harris wrote:
>>> On 09/03/2016 21:29, Bernhard Schornak wrote:
>
> [All OT]
>
> Notwithstanding your desire to bring this to an end, I will respond in some places. Don't feel that
> you need to reply.
>
>>> IMO the host countries should make sure the camps are safe, if only by
>>> policing. There may be an
>>> opportunity there to employ people living in the camps.
>>
>> http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e486676.html
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanon
>>
>> Just compare the numbers: About 1/6th of the population are
>> Syrian refugees. This was equivalent to 13,500,000 refugees
>> in Germany or 10,766,000 refugees in GB.
>>
>> I hope you got a picture of what you are talking about.
>
> I guess you mean that the number of people is too great for the Lebanon police force to handle.
No. I mean the number is too large to handle for a quite small
country like Lebanon. (Turkey will reach the limits they might
handle without problems sooner or later, as well.)
> That
> is true. But _everything_ about such high volumes of people makes them too many for Lebanon to
> handle. There are too many to house, too many to feed, too many to care for medically, too many to
> school properly etc.
>
> What I suggested was to use some of the refugees to help with policing. That would not just provide
> some security but it would also give the people so employed an opportunity to earn a _little_ bit of
> money rather than just relying on handouts.
>
> I would not suggest employing people as irregular police in the long term because that would be open
> to corruption. But I would get them to carry out basic policing duties for a while and then come off
> and let others take over.
>
> Basic policing could be about writing and collating reports of problems in the communities. The
> regular Lebanese trained police would take any actions needed.
Law and order (police / justice) are of little worth if people
starve or freeze to death, because the infrastructure to grant
them proper shelter and sufficient food is missing.
>>>> So you want more solidarity through more division.
>>>
>>> I don't see it that way. 1. Some countries *want* ever closer union.
>>> The UK doesn't. 2. Some other
>>> countries join the EU for economic reasons but don't really want to
>>> merge into another country. 3.
>>> And some countries, such as the UK, want to trade but not to integrate.
>>
>> That's picking the raisins from the cake (belonging to all)
>> and leaving the remains for all others. That's the opposite
>> of solidarity.
>
> Not at all. The EU trades around the world without requiring its worldwide trading partners to join
> a political union. And that trade is not "raisins" just for the country that trades with the EU; it
> benefits both sides.
>
> The EU model is ultimately unsustainable. Ruling over people without asking them periodically to
> approve the arrangement is undemocratic and it leads to two things: a ruling class who forget that
> they are there for the benefit of the people, and a people who become discontent with the ruling class.
>
> http://pensites.com/politics/article-1077/A-country-should-never-cede-power-without-periodic-referenda
>
> EU-scepticism is rising across the continent of Europe. In 1994 Norway voted 52:48 to stay out. Now,
> polling puts them at about 75:25. Iceland has recently decided to drop any pretence at wanting to
> join. So has Switzerland. The Dutch want a referendum (53% to 44%). The Czech PM "warned" that they
> could follow the UK out, if the UK leaves. The Hungarian PM has been very vocal against EU policies.
>
> In Portugal in 2015 about half the population voted for EU-sceptic parties. And note what the
> President said when ruling out allowing the left-wing coalition: "In 40 years of democracy, no
> government in Portugal has ever depended on the support of anti-European forces, that is to say
> forces that campaigned to abrogate the Lisbon Treaty, the Fiscal Compact, the Growth and Stability
> Pact, as well as to dismantle monetary union and take Portugal out of the euro, in addition to
> wanting the dissolution of NATO."
>
> In other words, just over half of voters had voted for parties with anti-EU agendas.
>
> Even in France, one of the most important members of the EU and one of the biggest beneficiaries,
> Marine LePen's Front National is gaining ground and topped a recent poll.
>
> In summary, forcing people into an undemocratic political union that they don't want is ultimately
> unsustainable. It would be better to help people work together without requiring that they head
> towards becoming a single state.
The extreme rigthists like Le Pen (F), Wilders (NL), Kaczyński
or Szydło (PL) and Orbán (HU) always were and still are strict
enemies of a united Europe. As nationalist forces, a united EU
would destroy their patridiotic dreams of one nation (or race)
ruling the entire world.
Watch the events in Poland - do you think they follow a proper
path as you cite their anti-democratic ideology as an argument
against a united Europe? Neighbours with common cultural roots
and common history should keep care of each other for *better*
reasons than disdainful mammonism.
>> Especially because the London Stock Exchange
>> and Real Estate Business are the driving force behind acce-
>> lerated redistribution of property and growing poverty. Not
>> only in GB. The entire Western World assimilated their idea
>> to generate money without offering real values in exchange,
>> for example: Computer generated profits with *not existing*
>> shares (the faster your machine and internet conection, the
>> higher your profit).
>
> I don't like to see dominant big corporations of any sort. I wonder if you recognise that the EU
> helps large companies at the expense of smaller competitors.
>
> http://pensites.com/politics/article-1072/Why-do-large-businesses-like-the-EU
They will not ask you if you like them or not (as long as they
can make money they just will do it without asking any one for
permission).
Let us talk about real things: I often delivered plastic parts
for Nissan Motors to Johnson Control in Sunderland (pressed in
Augsburg). With open borders and domestic EU commerce, there's
one EU-wide tax to pay, but no toll or other costs. Voting for
Brexit, you *also* vote for customs, import taxes and controls
when entering or leaving British territory. Any decision comes
at a cost and anything we do has consequences. In this case, a
car built in GB will get more expensive and it questionable if
Nissan will continue to build cars in the UK, because it costs
them a pound or two to compensate import taxes, customs, grown
transportation costs and other discomfort because a few people
voted to return to a time where the British Empire reached its
pinnacle (regardless of the fact that these times are over and
never will come back)...
>>> I am not suggesting "division" but democracy. The EU is a dreadfully
>>> protectionist, undemocratic
>>> supporter of vested interests and its instincts are continually to
>>> acquire and centralise more and
>>> more power to itself. The people who work in the EU are overpaid, out
>>> of touch and extravagant. For
>>> example, according to reports, 10,000 EU workers are paid more than
>>> the UK's prime minister, the EC
>>> president uses a private jet, and they are about to debate paying over
>>> 100,000 euros (per annum?)
>>> for uniforms for a set of liveried chauffeurs. That whole lot seems to
>>> me to be absolutely
>>> disgusting. And we all pay for it with our taxes.
>>
>> You're talking about peanuts. If you're eager to save money
>> for officials, cut those 44,400,000 Euro you spend for your
>> royals each year. All in all - these sums are less than 1 %
>> of the GDP of the UK, Germany or the EU as a whole.
>
> Saying that their waste and luxurious living is a small percentage of GDP is quite beyond my
> comprehension. There is no excuse for EU leaders to pay themselves high salaries and live and work
> in luxury.
>
> It may be a small percentage of GDP but it is still a lot of money.
Yes. On the other hand, these are *representatives* of a union
with 500,000,000 citicens. Calculating the "per head" share of
44,400,000 Euro, each European pays 8.88 Cent per anno to feed
the "luxury" of her/his representatives. Not too much compared
to the 68.86 Cent per head "Brits" grant their royals per anno
(including the toll for Dartford crossing)... ;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dartford_Crossing
>>> I should say that my beef is with the EU organisation, not in any way
>>> with continental neighbours and friends.
>>>
>>> The UK joined the EU being told it was a common market. It has since
>>> gradually become much more than
>>> that. It's like joining a tennis club that over time changes into a
>>> rugby club. Ok if you like rugby
>>> but not if you prefer tennis.
>>
>> Come on, no one forced your parliament to sign any of those
>> contracts to connect all European countries and grow into a
>> Union like the UK or USA.
>
> True, though no one has asked _the people_ for over 40 years!
Do you really claim to live in a *dictatorship* since 1976? If
your answer is no: You (the British people) voted for previous
parliaments - you were not forced to vote for those who follow
the European idea and sign pro-European contracts. Democracies
do not have to start a referendum for each political decision:
Their citicens *delegate* the power to decide to a parliament,
and, thereafter, the "avatars" they elected make decisions for
their citicens. AFAIK, no country in this world is governed by
"direct democracy". The one that comes closest is Switzerland,
but, even there: Most decisions do not require a "referendum".
All other countries rely on delegatees (=avatars) and frequent
election of candidates themselves or parties (or a mix of both
choices). Isn't it up to the *citicens* to vote for candidates
who offer solutions matching their own political wishes? Don't
blame the majority not to care about wishes of minorities, but
blame politicians who promise political deeds just to increase
their personal might or wealth, but act completely contrary to
what they promised when they are elected and start to make de-
cisions.
>> The future will show that we will
>> not survive if we don't work together as close as possible.
>
> We do not need the EU in order to work together!
That is what you - one of more than 64 million British folks -
believe (as no one can know this for real, it's just one valid
belief of many).
> I guess most countries joined the EU or its predecessors for prosperity.
Until the early 1970ies this is true. Thereafter, most leaders
advanced this pure commercial organisation into a cultural and
political Union with the final goal to found the United States
of Europe. Meanwhile, growing selfishness starts to divide the
mutually grown solidarity just to benefit from the weakness of
the poorest members of the Union. I am pretty sure the UK will
suffer from a "Brexit" as well as most other EU members, while
China, the USA and Japan will benefit from our faction.
> Directional changes used to require all heads of government to agree. But as the EU expanded they
> found it was hard to get anything agreed so they compromised and accepted majority voting (no longer
> needing total agreement). Since then, countries representatives can be overruled. They have to
> accept the will of the majority.
>
> No one ever asks the populations what they want out of the EU or what policies the EU should follow.
> That is a recipe for discontent.
>
> Nations can work together without being in the EU. For example, on security the UK and its partners
> would continue to work together post-Brexit because we all need to cooperate. Such cooperation does
> not need anyone to be in a politico-economic club. In fact, one US ex CIA director said the EU tends
> to get in the way of security.
>
> Leaving the EU is not about isolation and it would not stop cooperation.
>
> http://pensites.com/politics/article-1100/Is-Brexit-about-isolation
It already split Europe into parts. The damage done during the
last one or two years cannot be fixed in the coming decade...
>>> That, to me, is a positive view of both: family and friends. But we
>>> share a home with family.
>>> Friends don't live with us but we visit each other often.
>>
>>
>> That's the local point of view. I prefer an universal point
>> of view, where all life in the universe respects each other
>> and strives to share all forces providing a maximum benefit
>> for all involved forces.
>
> I like that universal vision too. What you must accept, though, is that there are people out there
> who do not. While most of us want to get on well and be friends with our neighbours there are people
> in the world who want to do us harm. We must protect ourselves from them.
I am aware of those who want to return to Middle Age politics,
and I don't see any difference between fundamentalist Muslims,
fundamentalist Christians or fundamentalist patriots: They all
try to force the entire population to obey their rules. That's
nothing a democrat (or humanist) can agree with.
>> What is wishful thinking right now
>> might become our only way to survive in the near future.
>>
>> Only the fittest (not the strongest or richest) survive...
>
> Yes, it is wishful thinking. Unless the peaceful stand up for themselves, it won't be the fittest
> but the aggressors who will survive.
Yes.
>>> I don't see the UK's potential separation from the EU as "division".
>>> Brits would still want to work
>>> together, trade, and cooperate with European neighbours. What many of
>>> us don't want is lack of
>>> democracy and rule from a supranational government.
>>
>> You can't demand the benefits if you deny to pay the price?
>
> Ask yourself /why/ supranational government is part of the price. No other trading bloc in the world
> has political integration as its aim. Only the EU has that as a core part of the "price" of membership.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Community
What you are talking about does no longer exist since 1993.
With the process of re-uniting both German states, the leaders
of the EEC (namely Kohl, Mitterand and Thatcher/Major) came to
the conclusion that only a united Europe might be fit to with-
stand the challenges of our future, so they ignited the "fire"
to develop the United States of Europe. It is based on solida-
rity and mutual assistance - the pillars of freedom and wealth
for all citicens. Now that many people throughout Europe don't
(want to) support this goal any longer, preferring nationalism
over solidarity and neo-darwinism over assistance, we will get
oppression and poverty in the long run. I don't know why folks
support mechanisms to shuffle the wealth of many onto accounts
of a few superrich, but they will earn their "price" (which is
total poverty with an optimized (= abolished) welfare system).
I hope I will die before this inhuman world is established...
Greetings from Augsburg
Bernhard Schornak
P.S.: Providing links to your own texts is a valid move, but I
did not see a single footnote citing independent sources
backing up your claims. As long as these are monologues,
they represent private *opinion* - nothing less, nothing
more. If you want to lend your words meaning, you should
furnish your claims with facts supporting the underlying
ideas. Here is a (actually my) philosophical view of the
problem:
http://thepoolofhumanity.blogspot.de/2010/02/introduction.html
http://thepoolofhumanity.blogspot.de/2010/02/living-in-pyramid-land-part-1.html
http://thepoolofhumanity.blogspot.de/2010/03/living-in-pyramid-land-part-2.html
http://thepoolofhumanity.blogspot.de/2015/06/living-in-pyramid-land-part-3.html
Back to alt.os.development | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-11 19:11 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:10 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 04:41 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:37 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 07:20 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 18:37 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 21:03 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 13:49 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 06:27 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 19:02 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 15:10 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 20:30 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 20:07 -0700
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 22:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-20 18:48 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 20:04 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-30 20:32 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 13:51 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 17:35 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 17:09 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-16 14:30 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 21:40 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 07:34 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-18 08:37 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 23:35 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-19 12:52 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 13:09 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-19 21:46 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:15 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-21 21:48 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:16 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-22 23:02 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-01-23 17:04 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 15:27 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-02-29 09:26 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:02 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:48 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-09 22:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:41 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-29 09:00 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-09 22:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:36 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-03-29 09:01 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 10:13 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-04-10 19:33 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-04-15 16:27 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:10 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:17 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 08:44 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-29 12:05 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:28 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:46 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-26 23:58 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK (was: C parser ramblings, language design, etc) Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 00:08 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 06:40 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 05:25 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:45 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 18:25 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 23:44 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-03 16:56 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:23 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-04 17:22 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 11:47 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-06 19:34 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 12:51 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 19:20 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 01:46 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 21:43 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 09:36 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-08 15:34 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 11:25 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-10 17:32 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-10 18:25 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 00:06 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-07 21:32 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 07:41 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-02 16:21 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 14:59 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-20 21:13 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-20 21:17 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 08:04 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-05-21 11:16 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:11 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-20 22:51 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 07:29 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 08:33 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-02 16:21 -0400
UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-06-11 14:34 -0400
Re: UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:28 +0100
Re: UK pronunciation was, [Re: OT: Obama in the UK, was C lang parser ramblings] Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:54 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 18:21 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-25 21:54 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 10:02 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfrze.cam> - 2016-07-26 07:56 -0400
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:26 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: OT: Obama in the UK James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 09:25 +0100
Re: OT: Obama in the UK Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:11 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 07:59 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 00:01 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:28 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 05:42 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:16 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-27 18:05 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:29 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:42 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 14:34 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 11:27 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 16:34 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-05-21 21:10 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 12:10 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Bernhard Schornak <schornak@web.de> - 2016-06-01 19:22 +0200
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 18:29 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-26 11:47 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:08 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-01-28 11:54 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:47 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 10:13 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 18:29 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:15 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-27 17:31 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 11:07 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-19 22:28 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:04 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-01-25 17:48 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 17:16 +0000
Re: cows and bulls game, was [Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc] "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-12-27 21:19 -0500
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-30 20:32 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 15:13 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-05 21:56 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-27 13:56 +0000
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-10-21 19:46 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:38 +0100
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-09-13 07:10 -0400
Re: C parser ramblings, language design, etc "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-01 09:07 -0800
csiph-web