Re: Non-composites never seen before

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Non-composites never seen before
Date	2016-04-06 09:45 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ne37dp$p5a$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <luPMy.667$JM6.231@fx44.iad> <ne1d56$1m6v$9@gioia.aioe.org> <vi_My.16716$4s2.2050@fx01.iad> <ne2vb5$918$2@gioia.aioe.org> <vW8Ny.44$S5.19@fx20.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/6/2016 9:20 AM, benj wrote:
> On 04/06/2016 08:27 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 4/5/2016 9:14 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2016 06:10 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/2016 8:56 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 04/05/2016 08:30 AM, john wrote:
>>>>>> Ben was getting down to it, OdD;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Equal Universal expansion is an impossibility.
>>>>>> Think about it.
>>>>>> Your spots on the balloon's surface
>>>>>> retreat equally from each other. One
>>>>>> layer down, not so much.
>>>>>> Near the center, they barely move.
>>>>>> So.
>>>>>> How does EVERYTHING retreat equally
>>>>>> from each other?
>>>>>> I suggest that you actually try to model
>>>>>> this concept, Odd.
>>>>>> Logically.
>>>>>> This "universal expansion" concept.
>>>>>> It can be shown to be logically impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Logically impossible" is no problem for Odd or HVAC. In their
>>>>> world if
>>>>> they can imagine it, it is therefore true in the real world.
>>>>
>>>> If it is imaginable, it is not logically impossible, is it? Being
>>>> logically possible does not mean that it exists in the true world. Lots
>>>> of things are LOGICALLY POSSIBLE even if experiment shows it does not
>>>> happen.
>>>>
>>>> I'll give you an example: Magnetic monopoles. Nothing logically
>>>> impossible about them. It appears they don't exist anyway. So does that
>>>> mean they're suddenly logically impossible?
>>>>
>>>> Let's take another example. Hitler's grandchildren. Logically
>>>> impossible? Of course not. Do they exist? No.
>>>>
>>>> How about a rod that happens to be EXACTLY 2 meters long? Logically
>>>> impossible? No. Does it exist? Probably not.
>>> How clever you are to turn "Logically impossible" into "logically
>>> possible" and then use that to "prove" I've lost the debate. Winning any
>>> cases lately?  Defending lots of crooks I presume. You are almost as
>>> great a wordsmith as our moderator.
>>>
>>
>> It takes no debating skill when you say something that is obviously
>> silly.
>>
>> It'd be like calling me a sharpshooter when you get shot in the foot by
>> your own gun held in your own hand.
>
> That makes no sense whatsoever! No wonder HVAC loves it! He loves lies
> and insane statements. He's also gay.
>
> "Points" do not exist so how can a rod be "exactly" 2 meters long?

I didn't say anything about points. I said a physical rod. I assume that 
2 meters EXACTLY corresponds to a real length. Or are you saying that 
all real lengths have values like 2.013 m or 2.0000001 m but NEVER 2 m 
exactly, and that 2 m exactly is a physically impossible length? Note I 
did not say that you'd be able to MEASURE it exactly. I just said that 
the real length, regardless whether or how you measure it, is 2 m 
exactly. Is it your statement that such a real length (independent of 
measurement) is physically and logically impossible?

> You'd
> have to have the length accurate to actual "point" which is a fantasy.
> So such a bar is logically possible only in your mind. So your argument
> is that Tinker Bell is logically possible but just does not exist. But
> you can't even prove that. To prove that negative would take
> superpowers! Hence you believe that all the following are "logically
> possible":
>
> Ghosts
> ESP
> Astral projection
> The 9/11 conspiracy
> Aliens and UFOs
> Atlantis
> Ley lines
> Telekinesis
> The bible
> God
> Planet Nibru is coming
> HVAC is a government agent
> Vaccines are bad
> Ancient aliens
> JFK conspiracy
> Operation paperclip
>
> I won't tell HVAC that you believe in all these things if you won't!
>
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 09:27 -0700
  Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 13:33 -0400
  Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:19 -0500
    Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 09:20 -0700
      Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:54 -0500
      Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:58 +0000
        Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:52 -0500
          Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:33 -0400
            Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0500
              Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:26 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:51 -0400
              Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:30 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:55 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:06 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:53 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:16 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:28 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:09 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:28 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:51 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:23 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:16 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:06 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:20 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:56 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:09 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:56 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:36 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 16:09 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 02:17 +0000
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:15 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:08 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:13 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:37 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:48 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:52 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:03 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:17 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:21 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:35 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:32 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:10 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:14 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:20 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:53 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:00 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:19 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:40 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 18:55 +0000
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:20 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:08 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:28 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:47 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:14 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:27 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:47 -0700
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:20 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:45 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:10 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:56 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:17 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
              Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:42 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:11 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:25 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:11 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:41 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:07 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:55 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:15 -0400
                Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:46 -0500
                Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 23:24 -0400
      Re: Non-composites never seen before Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-04 12:11 -0700
  Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:58 -0500

csiph-web