Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #568177
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Non-composites never seen before |
| References | (5 earlier) <0CEMy.8$kQ1.1@fx39.iad> <ne091c$1beo$3@gioia.aioe.org> <22399dc5-87d5-4752-bd06-38e92659c5bd@googlegroups.com> <luPMy.667$JM6.231@fx44.iad> <ne1d56$1m6v$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Message-ID | <vi_My.16716$4s2.2050@fx01.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | TeraNews.com |
| Date | 2016-04-05 22:14 -0400 |
On 04/05/2016 06:10 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 4/5/2016 8:56 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 08:30 AM, john wrote:
>>> Ben was getting down to it, OdD;
>>>
>>> Equal Universal expansion is an impossibility.
>>> Think about it.
>>> Your spots on the balloon's surface
>>> retreat equally from each other. One
>>> layer down, not so much.
>>> Near the center, they barely move.
>>> So.
>>> How does EVERYTHING retreat equally
>>> from each other?
>>> I suggest that you actually try to model
>>> this concept, Odd.
>>> Logically.
>>> This "universal expansion" concept.
>>> It can be shown to be logically impossible.
>>
>> "Logically impossible" is no problem for Odd or HVAC. In their world if
>> they can imagine it, it is therefore true in the real world.
>
> If it is imaginable, it is not logically impossible, is it? Being
> logically possible does not mean that it exists in the true world. Lots
> of things are LOGICALLY POSSIBLE even if experiment shows it does not
> happen.
>
> I'll give you an example: Magnetic monopoles. Nothing logically
> impossible about them. It appears they don't exist anyway. So does that
> mean they're suddenly logically impossible?
>
> Let's take another example. Hitler's grandchildren. Logically
> impossible? Of course not. Do they exist? No.
>
> How about a rod that happens to be EXACTLY 2 meters long? Logically
> impossible? No. Does it exist? Probably not.
How clever you are to turn "Logically impossible" into "logically
possible" and then use that to "prove" I've lost the debate. Winning any
cases lately? Defending lots of crooks I presume. You are almost as
great a wordsmith as our moderator.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 09:27 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 13:33 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:19 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 09:20 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:54 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:58 +0000
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:52 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:33 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:26 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:51 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:30 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:55 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:06 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:53 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:16 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:28 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:09 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:28 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:51 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:23 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:16 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:06 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:20 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:56 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:09 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:56 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:36 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 02:17 +0000
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:15 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:08 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:13 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:37 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:48 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:52 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:03 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:17 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:21 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:35 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:32 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:14 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:20 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:53 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:00 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:19 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:40 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 18:55 +0000
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:20 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:08 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:28 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:47 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:14 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:27 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:47 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:20 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:45 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:10 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:56 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:17 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:42 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:11 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:25 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:11 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:41 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:07 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:55 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:15 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:46 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 23:24 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-04 12:11 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:58 -0500
csiph-web