Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #568234
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Non-composites never seen before |
| Date | 2016-04-06 07:27 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ne2vb5$918$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <ne091c$1beo$3@gioia.aioe.org> <22399dc5-87d5-4752-bd06-38e92659c5bd@googlegroups.com> <luPMy.667$JM6.231@fx44.iad> <ne1d56$1m6v$9@gioia.aioe.org> <vi_My.16716$4s2.2050@fx01.iad> |
On 4/5/2016 9:14 PM, benj wrote: > On 04/05/2016 06:10 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/5/2016 8:56 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 04/05/2016 08:30 AM, john wrote: >>>> Ben was getting down to it, OdD; >>>> >>>> Equal Universal expansion is an impossibility. >>>> Think about it. >>>> Your spots on the balloon's surface >>>> retreat equally from each other. One >>>> layer down, not so much. >>>> Near the center, they barely move. >>>> So. >>>> How does EVERYTHING retreat equally >>>> from each other? >>>> I suggest that you actually try to model >>>> this concept, Odd. >>>> Logically. >>>> This "universal expansion" concept. >>>> It can be shown to be logically impossible. >>> >>> "Logically impossible" is no problem for Odd or HVAC. In their world if >>> they can imagine it, it is therefore true in the real world. >> >> If it is imaginable, it is not logically impossible, is it? Being >> logically possible does not mean that it exists in the true world. Lots >> of things are LOGICALLY POSSIBLE even if experiment shows it does not >> happen. >> >> I'll give you an example: Magnetic monopoles. Nothing logically >> impossible about them. It appears they don't exist anyway. So does that >> mean they're suddenly logically impossible? >> >> Let's take another example. Hitler's grandchildren. Logically >> impossible? Of course not. Do they exist? No. >> >> How about a rod that happens to be EXACTLY 2 meters long? Logically >> impossible? No. Does it exist? Probably not. > How clever you are to turn "Logically impossible" into "logically > possible" and then use that to "prove" I've lost the debate. Winning any > cases lately? Defending lots of crooks I presume. You are almost as > great a wordsmith as our moderator. > It takes no debating skill when you say something that is obviously silly. It'd be like calling me a sharpshooter when you get shot in the foot by your own gun held in your own hand. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 09:27 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 13:33 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:19 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 09:20 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:54 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:58 +0000
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:52 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:33 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:26 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:51 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:30 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 05:55 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 06:06 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:53 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:16 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:28 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:09 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:28 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:51 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:23 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:16 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:06 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:20 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:56 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:09 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:56 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:36 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 02:17 +0000
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:15 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:08 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:13 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:37 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:48 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:52 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:03 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:17 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:21 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:35 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:32 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:14 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:20 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:53 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:00 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:19 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 22:40 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 18:55 +0000
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:20 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:08 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:28 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:47 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:14 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:27 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 05:47 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:20 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:45 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:10 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:56 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:17 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:42 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:10 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 22:11 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:25 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:11 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 09:41 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 11:07 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:55 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 15:15 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:46 -0500
Re: Non-composites never seen before benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 23:24 -0400
Re: Non-composites never seen before Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-04 12:11 -0700
Re: Non-composites never seen before Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:58 -0500
csiph-web