Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #561996

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/12/2016 3:56 PM, James McGinn wrote:


>>>> to you, everything.  But you do not realize it.
>>>>
>>>> Because you do not understand Science, with your "Magical
>>>> Plasma" your imagination is in full control.
>>>>
>>>> You have nothing to back up anything you say, except your
>>>> imagination, right airhead ?
>>>
>>> LOL.  Somebody creates a model as a conjecture to explain
>>> surface tension.  I present an alternate model/conjecture
>>
>> from your "paper"
>>
>> "Surface Tension Explained -The two dimensions of a surface
>> restricts the completion of hydrogen bonds that would normally
>> occur in the less restricted three dimensions below the surface of
>> liquid water."
>>
>> That is it. One sentance no math, no diagrams
>
> The detais are in my paper, which is way over your little head.


again, your details is one sentence, simpleton -  from your "paper" 
(which is poop)

"Surface Tension Explained -The two dimensions of a surface restricts
the completion of hydrogen bonds that would normally occur in the less
restricted three dimensions below the surface of liquid water."

That is it. One sentence no math, no diagrams And it of course is wrong,
it dosent explain how a insects can land on water surface and not get
wet. You one sentence "theory" states the opposite.



>
>
>
> And it of course is wrong,
>> it dosent explain how a insects can land on water surface and not
>> get wet. You one sentance "theory" states the opposite.
>
> Yeah, so?  My theory works.  It's not contrived.

only you think it works, and you have no experiments to back it up. It 
is contrived, it is fiction, imagination.

>
>
>>
>>
>>> and this whackjob uses the original model/conjecture as if it was
>>> fact to dispute mine. And you three birdbrains have such marginal
>>> intellectual skills you think its my fault for not just blindly
>>> accepting this rather obviously invalid tactic.
>>
>> you have no idea what you are blabbling about at all
>>
>> It is your fault for stating stupid imaginary ideas in a science
>> forum without any justification at all, and getting arrows in your
>> butt, "magical plasma".........., you get what you deserve,
>> disrespect.
>>
>> You show disrespect for the truth.
>
> There is truth and there is what everybody believes.  If you don't
> understand scientific methods you will not be able to tell the
> difference.

BS, you don't know scientific method,
and you hate the truth,
you "think outside the box"

so you are a babbling wackjob, driving off your viewers, especially with 
those INSANE you tube videos, Mr. Wackjob.



>>> Duhr.
>>>
>>
>> Duhr   1. Something uttered by a complete retarted idiot.
>>
>> "Duhr." -person who got the 3% in art class
>>
>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=duhr
>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 18:26 -0800
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:26 +0100
    Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:39 -0800
      Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 10:22 -0600
        Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:42 -0800
          Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 14:26 -0600
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 12:41 -0800
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 15:32 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 13:56 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 19:12 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 19:48 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 04:12 +0000
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 20:46 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 06:02 +0000
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:38 -0600

csiph-web