Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #561942

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/12/2016 2:41 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 12:27:10 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>> On 3/12/2016 10:42 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 8:23:03 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 3/11/2016 1:39 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 11:26:18 PM UTC-8, Poutnik
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dne 11/03/2016 v 03:26 James McGinn napsal(a):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> James McGinn: It's still just a model, dumbass.  Model's
>>>>>>> are not evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ..and that is why the simple evidence of vapour
>>>>>> pressure/vapour density ratio kicks your heavy vapour
>>>>>> hypothesis on its ass.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not even relevant.
>>>>
>>>> he was repeating your comments.
>>>>
>>>> The Heavy Air Theory has already been discovered.
>>>
>>> Relevance?
>>>
>>
>> to you, everything.  But you do not realize it.
>>
>> Because you do not understand Science, with your "Magical Plasma"
>> your imagination is in full control.
>>
>> You have nothing to back up anything you say, except your
>> imagination, right airhead ?
>
> LOL.  Somebody creates a model as a conjecture to explain surface
> tension.  I present an alternate model/conjecture

from your "paper"

"Surface Tension Explained -The two dimensions of a surface restricts 
the completion of hydrogen bonds that would normally occur in the less 
restricted three dimensions below the surface of liquid water."

That is it. One sentance no math, no diagrams And it of course is wrong, 
it dosent explain how a insects can land on water surface and not get 
wet. You one sentance "theory" states the opposite.


> and this whackjob
> uses the original model/conjecture as if it was fact to dispute mine.
> And you three birdbrains have such marginal intellectual skills you
> think its my fault for not just blindly accepting this rather
> obviously invalid tactic.

       you have no idea what you are blabbling about at all

It is your fault for stating stupid imaginary ideas in a science forum 
without any justification at all, and getting arrows in your butt, 
"magical plasma".........., you get what you deserve, disrespect.

You show disrespect for the truth.


>
> Duhr.
>

  Duhr   1. Something uttered by a complete retarted idiot.

"Duhr."
-person who got the 3% in art class

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=duhr

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 18:26 -0800
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:26 +0100
    Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:39 -0800
      Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 10:22 -0600
        Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:42 -0800
          Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 14:26 -0600
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 12:41 -0800
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 15:32 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 13:56 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 19:12 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 19:48 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 04:12 +0000
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 20:46 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 06:02 +0000
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:38 -0600

csiph-web