Groups > sci.physics > #561928

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time
Date	2016-03-12 14:26 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nc1u2p$15j0$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<47eeb7db-ef85-40b3-8a50-0e1b71863a8c@googlegroups.com> <nbtrou$m7d$1@dont-email.me> <7d318a8c-f12c-4636-ad16-2b0832135e04@googlegroups.com> <nc1fp3$f7p$2@gioia.aioe.org> <9cf69add-a7e4-474c-8214-333c2b418a56@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/12/2016 10:42 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 8:23:03 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>> On 3/11/2016 1:39 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 11:26:18 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
>>>> Dne 11/03/2016 v 03:26 James McGinn napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> James McGinn:
>>>>> It's still just a model, dumbass.  Model's are not evidence.
>>>>
>>>> ..and that is why the simple evidence
>>>> of vapour pressure/vapour density ratio
>>>> kicks your heavy vapour hypothesis on its ass.
>>>
>>> It's not even relevant.
>>
>> he was repeating your comments.
>>
>> The Heavy Air Theory has already been discovered.
>
> Relevance?
>

to you, everything.  But you do not realize it.

Because you do not understand Science, with your "Magical Plasma" your 
imagination is in full control.

You have nothing to back up anything you say, except your imagination, 
right airhead ?

Thread

H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 18:26 -0800
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:26 +0100
    Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:39 -0800
      Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 10:22 -0600
        Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:42 -0800
          Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 14:26 -0600
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 12:41 -0800
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 15:32 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 13:56 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 19:12 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 19:48 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 04:12 +0000
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 20:46 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 06:02 +0000
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:38 -0600

csiph-web