Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #561879

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time
Date 2016-03-12 10:22 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nc1fp3$f7p$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <47eeb7db-ef85-40b3-8a50-0e1b71863a8c@googlegroups.com> <nbtrou$m7d$1@dont-email.me> <7d318a8c-f12c-4636-ad16-2b0832135e04@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/11/2016 1:39 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 11:26:18 PM UTC-8, Poutnik wrote:
>> Dne 11/03/2016 v 03:26 James McGinn napsal(a):
>>
>>>
>>> James McGinn:
>>> It's still just a model, dumbass.  Model's are not evidence.
>>
>> ..and that is why the simple evidence
>> of vapour pressure/vapour density ratio
>> kicks your heavy vapour hypothesis on its ass.
>
> It's not even relevant.

he was repeating your comments.

The Heavy Air Theory has already been discovered.




>> Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
>>
>> Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 18:26 -0800
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:26 +0100
    Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:39 -0800
      Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 10:22 -0600
        Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:42 -0800
          Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 14:26 -0600
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 12:41 -0800
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 15:32 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 13:56 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-12 19:12 -0600
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 19:48 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 04:12 +0000
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 20:46 -0800
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-13 06:02 +0000
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:38 -0600

csiph-web