Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #378640

Re: black hole collision

From Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: black hole collision
Date 2016-03-11 22:18 +0000
Organization W. Gottfried
Message-ID <nbvg8b$1vi$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <nb9s8p$1go0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <DeSdnaUCxYyTHEXLnZ2dnUU7-fcAAAAA@giganews.com> <nba0s6$1ojf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nba1es$1q4b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <MPG.314aaba7f138d44c989fd6@news.eternal-september.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


J. Clarke wrote:

>> > Yes, except gravity, which as said, is inexhaustible under every
>> > circumstances. Take that Gravity away, or make it lesser, then you
>> > have no Universe. Learn some math and Physics, lady.
>> 
>> I know, there are nincompoops around here saying that Gravity gives no
>> energy out of it. Of course it does, the trick is to cheat the
>> conservativism of the potentials, and make it unstable. IE see the
>> Hydroelectric Power Plants, which gives plenty with energy to
>> everybody.
>> Because of Gravity and only because of that, and nothing else.
> 
> Sorry, but no.  Hydro plants only work because water is flowing
> downhill. Figure out how the water gets UP the hill and you'll have
> taken a big step toward understanding where the energy used by hydro
> plants comes from.

Does not really matter, once you brake the cycle, and become the man in 
the middle, all the energy is flowing to you, and is free.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

black hole collision RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-01 15:53 -0800
  Re: black hole collision Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-01 19:27 -0600
    Re: black hole collision Hannu Poropudas <hanporop@luukku.com> - 2016-03-11 02:16 -0800
      Re: black hole collision Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:07 -0600
        Re: black hole collision Hannu Poropudas <hanporop@luukku.com> - 2016-03-12 00:42 -0800
  Re: black hole collision mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-01 22:53 -0800
  Re: black hole collision "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-02 14:26 +0100
  Re: black hole collision Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:22 -0600
  Re: black hole collision jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-03-03 08:04 -0800
    Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 17:28 +0000
      Re: black hole collision Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:23 -0600
        Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 18:47 +0000
          Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 18:57 +0000
            Re: black hole collision "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:53 -0500
              Re: black hole collision Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:18 +0000
  Re: black hole collision David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-03 08:15 -0800

csiph-web