Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #377798

Re: black hole collision

From Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: black hole collision
Date 2016-03-03 17:28 +0000
Organization Odo Wilfried Institute
Message-ID <nb9s8p$1go0$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <235f895b-6cc9-4bc2-bf7b-27fe0adb61ea@googlegroups.com> <f2165a21-1c81-4333-a26b-933e5e3963a9@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


jamesl51165 wrote:

> вторник, 1 март 2016 г., 15:53:35 UTC-8, RichD написа:
>> LIGO observed the collision of two black holes, and many
> 
> One maximum gravity would orbit another gravity...
> these natural orbits don't decay and are the order...
> collision science would remain at orbit science.
> Accretion discs orbit as well; there is no chance for decay.
> Mitchell Raemsch

Good point. Gravity is an inexhaustible source of static energy, or 
curvature of the geometry of spacetime if you wish. Which is only a 
projection, but nevertheless, is an energy exteriorized by a force which 
can make a leg go broke.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

black hole collision RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-01 15:53 -0800
  Re: black hole collision Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-01 19:27 -0600
    Re: black hole collision Hannu Poropudas <hanporop@luukku.com> - 2016-03-11 02:16 -0800
      Re: black hole collision Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:07 -0600
        Re: black hole collision Hannu Poropudas <hanporop@luukku.com> - 2016-03-12 00:42 -0800
  Re: black hole collision mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-01 22:53 -0800
  Re: black hole collision "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-02 14:26 +0100
  Re: black hole collision Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:22 -0600
  Re: black hole collision jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-03-03 08:04 -0800
    Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 17:28 +0000
      Re: black hole collision Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:23 -0600
        Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 18:47 +0000
          Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 18:57 +0000
            Re: black hole collision "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:53 -0500
              Re: black hole collision Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:18 +0000
  Re: black hole collision David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-03 08:15 -0800

csiph-web