Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #377807

Re: black hole collision

From Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: black hole collision
Date 2016-03-03 18:57 +0000
Organization Odo Wilfried Institute
Message-ID <nba1es$1q4b$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <235f895b-6cc9-4bc2-bf7b-27fe0adb61ea@googlegroups.com> <f2165a21-1c81-4333-a26b-933e5e3963a9@googlegroups.com> <nb9s8p$1go0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <DeSdnaUCxYyTHEXLnZ2dnUU7-fcAAAAA@giganews.com> <nba0s6$1ojf$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Helénē Swanhild wrote:

> Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
>> On 3/3/16 11:28 AM, Helénē Swanhild wrote:
>>> Gravity is an inexhaustible source of static energy
>> 
>>    Perhaps you are thinking of Potential energy in a gravitational
>>    field. There is nothing inexhaustible in this universe.
> 
> Yes, except gravity, which as said, is inexhaustible under every
> circumstances. Take that Gravity away, or make it lesser, then you have
> no Universe. Learn some math and Physics, lady.

I know, there are nincompoops around here saying that Gravity gives no 
energy out of it. Of course it does, the trick is to cheat the 
conservativism of the potentials, and make it unstable. IE see the 
Hydroelectric Power Plants, which gives plenty with energy to everybody. 
Because of Gravity and only because of that, and nothing else.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

black hole collision RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-01 15:53 -0800
  Re: black hole collision Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-01 19:27 -0600
    Re: black hole collision Hannu Poropudas <hanporop@luukku.com> - 2016-03-11 02:16 -0800
      Re: black hole collision Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 07:07 -0600
        Re: black hole collision Hannu Poropudas <hanporop@luukku.com> - 2016-03-12 00:42 -0800
  Re: black hole collision mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-01 22:53 -0800
  Re: black hole collision "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-02 14:26 +0100
  Re: black hole collision Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:22 -0600
  Re: black hole collision jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-03-03 08:04 -0800
    Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 17:28 +0000
      Re: black hole collision Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 12:23 -0600
        Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 18:47 +0000
          Re: black hole collision Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 18:57 +0000
            Re: black hole collision "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 21:53 -0500
              Re: black hole collision Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:18 +0000
  Re: black hole collision David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-03 08:15 -0800

csiph-web