Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #554205

Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics
Date 2016-02-18 07:39 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <na4hhh$1gv1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <PZ%wy.13324$qK.1811@fx17.iad> <na22s0$uqd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cE5xy.70479$xs7.24475@fx14.iad> <na2sa1$sod$1@gioia.aioe.org> <Je8xy.5470$KK.1504@fx19.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/17/2016 6:28 PM, benj wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 05:30 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 2/17/2016 3:30 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 02/17/2016 10:16 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 2/17/2016 9:04 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> What I hate are ignorant dishonest wordmeisters like yourself who know
>>>>> know science, have no science education yet want to become
>>>>> self-appointed dictators of everything done in science. That's why I
>>>>> hate everything you represent, not only in science.
>>>>
>>>> Ben, if you want to study ESP, go ahead. Nobody is going to stop
>>>> you. No
>>>> dictator is going to say, "Ben, you are not permitted to study ESP
>>>> scientifically."
>>>>
>>>> But if you then want to publish a paper on your work, then you do not
>>>> have a native freedom to select your audience. You can't say, "It is my
>>>> inborn right to have the readers of Physical Review A see the
>>>> results of
>>>> my work."
>>>>
>>>> If someone writes a novel and submits it to Simon & Schuster, and the
>>>> editor there declines to publish the novel, that is not the act of a
>>>> dictator.
>>>
>>> Yes he is. Especially when the refusal covers all novels of a certain
>>> topic or kind.
>>
>> COMPLETELY disagree, and I'm quite certain that most people disagree
>> with you.
>
> So in YOUR science a nice democratic vote determines truth! Do you
> understand how ignorant and irrational that is?

The meanings of "censorship" and "editorial control" and "moderation" 
are not a scientific manner. And yes, the meaning of words is a 
democratic thing. If you want to invent your own language because (in 
your mind) your definitions are scientifically true, then you go right 
ahead, Ben. See where it gets you.

>
>>> Of course with a private company that is allowed and
>>> expected.
>>
>> Right!
>>
>>> The idea is that when there is freedom different opinions will
>>> sort of cancel out. It's called a free press.
>>
>> Right! But of course in proportion to the interest. So a free press
>> outlet that caters to publications about Amish life is going to be
>> smaller than a free press outlet about rap music.
>>
>>> But when governments get involved in manipulating choices, then we are
>>> treading into areas that are political and I might mention illegal. I
>>> know illegal doesn't bother HVAC. How about You?
>>
>> Ben, according to you, governments are involved in EVERYTHING on one way
>> or the other. The only way you would ever get away from that is if
>> scientific research would be completely separated from any government
>> involvement -- i.e. sponsored and controlled by the private sector.
>
> Politicians -> power ; Bears -> honey!
>
>> So now here are some interesting questions:
>> - Will a private company invest in ESP research? If a private company
>> decides not to be interested in sponsoring or publishing ESP research,
>> is that censorship? (See your comment above, "Of course, with a private
>> company that is allowed and expected.") Are you HAPPY with the balance
>> afforded by free press, that might well produce very small private
>> sector interest in ESP research?
>
> I'm sure many private companies invest in ESP research.

Name three.

> The issue is
> Censorship. The issue is a controlled press and other media.

As I thought. You are complaining about lack of access to audiences, 
starved for attention. You want to be able to publish on any subject in 
any publication to any audience, whether that publication is a private 
company or not. (Television networks, newspapers, book publishers, 
journal publishers are all private companies, Ben. You can check on 
that.) So even though you said earlier that private companies have the 
right to decline publication of submissions if they choose, because in 
the end the free market balances all that out, somehow now that isn't 
good enough for you.

> The issue
> is government control of any research that to them threatens their
> perceived political power.

No government agency is going to prevent anyone from doing ESP research. 
Even you. Others too.

> This is not only illegal but destructive to
> the country and to science. The press today is so far from "free" that
> it is laughable for you to even suggest it. Pravda means 'truth' you know.
>
>
>> - Will a private company invest in general relativity research? If a
>> private company decides not to be interested in sponsoring or publishing
>> general relativity research, is that censorship? (See your comment
>> above, "Of course, with a private company that is allowed and
>> expected.") Are you HAPPY with the balance afforded by free press, that
>> might well produce very small private sector interest in general
>> relativity research?
>
> Will a private company invest in relativity research? What is the
> potential payback. (Investment, boinker is putting in money to fund
> something that will produce returns later. Putting a bunch of
> imaginative eggheads to work with some gigantic pyramid building project
> has little chance of any return.
>
> The serious problem that you SHOULD investigate but are too unqualified
> to do so, is the question of how much science the government already
> knows is TRUE and for political reasons keeps secret.

I'm sorry, but what? Which publishing houses have been squeezed by the 
government not to publish scientific research? Name the private 
companies that have been squashed.

> Even worse the
> government uses tax money to fund cover-ups and media censorship to
> insure that the secrets do not come out. Leaks of course do occur, but
> as we all know here all you need to do is start screaming that the
> leakers are KOOKS and INSANE and if they still won't shut up you tell
> HVAC to kill them. Obviously you are FOR this sort of thing.
>
> Since I'm insane, obviously nobody needs to listen to me.

We've had this discussion. Being insane doesn't mean you'll get ignored. 
People gape at insane people. Your getting attention doesn't mean you're 
not insane.

> So why do you
> keep responding to my insane trolls? HVAC is obsessed with me too. But I
> think he's in love with me.
>
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 17:08 -0600
  Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 15:28 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:59 -0500
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:16 -0600
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:40 -0500
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:01 -0600
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:44 -0500
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 09:49 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 08:01 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 12:47 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 12:46 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:35 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:34 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 07:27 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 05:59 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 07:30 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:23 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:46 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Dingus Dirtbag McGee" <insavad@example.com> - 2016-02-16 22:49 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 03:16 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 03:29 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 03:59 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:07 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 05:05 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 06:26 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 10:11 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 10:19 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 10:05 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:03 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 10:15 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 10:05 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-21 13:35 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:57 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-21 19:40 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 14:28 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-22 08:52 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 05:58 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 06:41 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 14:37 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-23 16:55 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:29 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:40 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:49 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:16 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 23:02 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 01:25 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-14 17:43 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:11 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 20:17 -0500
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:17 -0600
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 10:38 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:58 -0500
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:14 -0800
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:40 -0500
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:03 -0600
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:50 -0500
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 10:04 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 13:01 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:37 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:36 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 07:28 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:42 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:52 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:13 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 23:00 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 01:22 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 08:53 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 07:07 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:44 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:16 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:32 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 14:34 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:50 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:12 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 17:08 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 01:13 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 03:03 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 10:04 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:16 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:24 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 12:02 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 12:31 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:14 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 02:43 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 04:53 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:09 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:58 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:30 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:30 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:28 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 07:39 -0600
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:53 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-12 04:33 +0000
  Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 22:02 -0500
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:02 -0500
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-12 11:34 -0500
        Re: Ben Jacoby's hallucinations rule supreme, unreproachable. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:55 -0500
          Better art refines prior art. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 12:19 -0800
            Re: Better art refines prior art. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:29 -0600
              Re: Better art refines prior art. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:37 -0600
                Re: Better art refines prior art. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:47 -0800
              Re: Better art refines prior art. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 12:56 -0800
              Re: Better art refines prior art. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 04:50 -0800
            Re: Better art refines prior art. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:42 -0800
          Re: Ben Jacoby's hallucinations rule supreme, unreproachable. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-12 13:43 -0800
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-12 13:33 -0600
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:49 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:29 -0500
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-02-12 08:27 -0800
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-12 11:37 -0500
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-02-12 11:05 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:06 -0600
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-02-12 11:11 -0800
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 11:29 -0800
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:56 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-02-12 12:51 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 15:00 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-02-12 13:48 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-13 14:02 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-02-13 18:16 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:40 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 20:01 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 22:39 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:38 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 19:56 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 23:05 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:31 -0500
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-13 11:56 -0500
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:32 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:27 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:50 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 03:24 -0800
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:24 -0800
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 02:18 -0800
  Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-12 10:54 +0000
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 07:25 -0600
  Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-13 11:47 -0500
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 04:54 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 08:30 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:31 -0600
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 00:27 -0500
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 07:21 -0600
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:51 -0500
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:54 -0600
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:19 -0500
  Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-14 07:26 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:50 -0600
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-17 06:45 -0800
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:12 -0600
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-18 06:38 -0800
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:23 -0600
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-20 11:42 -0800
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:28 -0600
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-20 11:45 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:49 -0600
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:34 -0600
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-18 06:05 -0800
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 06:20 -0800
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:24 -0500
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:20 -0600
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-19 00:58 +0000
          Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-21 06:04 -0800
            Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-22 02:59 +0000
              Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-22 07:14 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 09:39 -0600
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-23 05:47 -0800
                Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-22 17:14 +0000
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 19:43 -0600
  Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-21 23:34 -0800
    Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-22 07:32 -0800
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 09:41 -0600
        Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-23 05:48 -0800
      Re: Gravitational waves and skeptics xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-22 15:12 -0800

csiph-web