Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #544863

Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq...

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq...
Date 2016-01-12 14:53 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <n73p3h$o37$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <a69f7d43-c998-4af6-b6b5-8e0492366eb2@googlegroups.com> <n70phe$1njn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b512be65-44ab-4d4d-9603-3b45818b1901@googlegroups.com> <n737qo$1m7q$3@gioia.aioe.org> <94853a5f-1df3-49f3-bea6-3c57504ba778@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/12/2016 2:32 PM, kenseto wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 10:58:21 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 1/12/2016 8:49 AM, kenseto wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 12:42:16 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 1/10/2016 10:34 AM, kenseto wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 2:57:46 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/9/2016 10:37 AM, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Schrodinger formulated his equation by reverse engineering. He noted that the
>>>>>>> available  experimental data is statistic so he formulated a statistical equation
>>>>>>> to fit the experimental data. That's all!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken, what gives you the right to make up history?
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't make up any history.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The above, which you wrote, is counter to documented history. You made
>>>> those statements up.
>>>
>>> You tell us how Schrodinger derived his equation.
>>>
>>
>> Screw that. You try reading how Schrodinger derived his equation, like
>> the rest of the world does, and you try not making stuff up.
>
> I go by what Feynman said.
>

So the beautiful thing about books is they have an index. So you can 
look up, say, "Schrodinger" in a book by Feynman to see what Feynman 
actually said about Schrodinger. The index points to the page, and you 
go to the page and you look for the word "Schrodinger" and then you just 
read the sentences containing that word.

And as it turns out, I have a number of books by Feynman, and so it was 
really easy to do what I just described. And BEHOLD, there is no 
statement like what you wrote above that shows up in that search.

So since this is something anyone can do with a book, even a child, you 
can understand why people might suspect that you just make this shit up.



-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Jay Bala <jay1bala@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 07:45 -0800
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 08:23 -0800
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-09 08:37 -0800
    Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 13:57 -0600
      Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 19:42 -0500
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:34 -0600
          Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 09:14 -0800
          Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 14:44 -0500
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 15:27 -0600
              Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:31 -0500
                Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:43 -0600
      Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-10 08:34 -0800
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 09:17 -0800
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 19:02 +0100
        Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:42 -0600
          Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 06:49 -0800
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:05 -0600
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:58 -0600
              Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-12 12:32 -0800
                Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 14:53 -0600
            Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 10:12 -0600
    Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 11:49 -0600
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 16:34 -0800
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 08:10 -0600
  Re: Richard Feynman on Schrödinger eq... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 15:23 -0600

csiph-web