Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #371842
| From | Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: On length contraction |
| Date | 2015-12-11 23:25 +0000 |
| Organization | Offshore Production |
| Message-ID | <n4fm24$ref$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <1f0e10c1-ce22-4751-b79f-5b685230fd1a@googlegroups.com> <n4d19e$4d3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n4ddc5$sjd$1@pcls7.std.com> <5a33526d-b2e3-4ed8-8219-94cdff4f2862@googlegroups.com> <n4f9nn$t9f$1@pcls7.std.com> |
Il giorno mercoledì Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:55:35 +0000, moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) ha scritto: >>> Freshman physics problems? Remember we're talking about someone who >>> can't even solve (-6)/(-2). (speaking of 4th Grade!) > >>Making up stuff.....that's why you are moron moroney. > > So tell us, what is the answer to (-6)/(-2) and why is that the correct > answer? You may think you are smart ass with this question, not seeing you Kenseto is magnitudes smarter and educated than you are. Thinking that your fraction should equate to 3 is wrong in Physics. Why, since both your Input Parameters appurtenance is the Negative Domain. So the Output has to stay appartenent in the same Domain of Applicability. (unless you specify those domain explicitly, of course) Kensoto 1 Moroney 0
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-05 07:55 -0800
Re: On length contraction Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-05 18:40 +0100
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-05 15:49 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-05 22:39 -0600
Re: On length contraction Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-06 10:28 +0100
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-06 05:40 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-06 09:03 -0600
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-09 02:37 -0800
Re: On length contraction fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-06 08:14 -0800
Re: On length contraction fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-06 08:27 -0800
Re: On length contraction fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-06 10:37 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-06 06:21 -0800
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:19 -0800
Stephane Baune tries to correct Ken Shito and, in the process, embarrasses himself "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-12-07 08:35 -0800
Re: On length contraction Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 08:24 +0100
Re: On length contraction Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:41 +0100
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-06 07:06 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-06 09:20 -0600
Re: On length contraction Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 21:43 +0100
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 09:46 -0600
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 15:09 -0600
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 09:49 -0600
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:10 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 10:01 -0600
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 08:28 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 10:57 -0600
Re: On length contraction mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-12-07 22:58 -0800
Re: On length contraction Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-08 08:44 +0100
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-08 14:33 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:56 -0600
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-10 20:07 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 13:13 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 17:19 -0600
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 02:45 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 21:11 -0800
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 06:57 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-11 19:20 -0800
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 19:55 +0000
Re: On length contraction Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-11 23:25 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-11 19:25 -0800
Re: On length contraction pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-11 19:48 -0800
Re: On length contraction pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-13 14:33 -0800
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-12 17:27 +0000
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 10:12 -0600
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 21:08 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 08:04 -0600
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-08 14:26 -0800
Re: On length contraction Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:40 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-09 06:50 -0800
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-09 09:06 -0800
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:47 -0800
Re: On length contraction Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 18:11 +0000
Re: On length contraction Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:32 -0600
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-09 11:18 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 06:57 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 06:46 -0800
Re: On length contraction wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2015-12-06 18:18 +0100
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-06 12:35 -0600
Re: On length contraction wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2015-12-06 21:58 +0100
Re: On length contraction wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2015-12-06 22:31 +0100
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 10:16 -0600
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 13:08 -0800
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 14:26 -0800
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 14:38 -0800
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 15:39 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 15:07 -0600
Re: On length contraction benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 02:21 -0500
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 10:44 -0600
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-14 08:59 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-14 09:05 -0800
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-14 09:48 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 12:18 -0600
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-15 05:49 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:21 -0600
Re: On length contraction mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-12-15 23:29 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-16 07:04 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 09:14 -0600
csiph-web