Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #371835
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: On length contraction |
| Date | 2015-12-11 19:55 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n4f9nn$t9f$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <n4cm2t$qsm$1@pcls7.std.com> <1f0e10c1-ce22-4751-b79f-5b685230fd1a@googlegroups.com> <n4d19e$4d3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n4ddc5$sjd$1@pcls7.std.com> <5a33526d-b2e3-4ed8-8219-94cdff4f2862@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 9:45:28 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Freshman physics problems? Remember we're talking about someone who can't >> even solve (-6)/(-2). (speaking of 4th Grade!) >Making up stuff.....that's why you are moron moroney. So tell us, what is the answer to (-6)/(-2) and why is that the correct answer? (Prediction: Like before, lots of evasion in response but no actual answer)
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-05 07:55 -0800
Re: On length contraction Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-05 18:40 +0100
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-05 15:49 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-05 22:39 -0600
Re: On length contraction Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-12-06 10:28 +0100
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-06 05:40 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-06 09:03 -0600
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-09 02:37 -0800
Re: On length contraction fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-06 08:14 -0800
Re: On length contraction fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-06 08:27 -0800
Re: On length contraction fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-12-06 10:37 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-06 06:21 -0800
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:19 -0800
Stephane Baune tries to correct Ken Shito and, in the process, embarrasses himself "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-12-07 08:35 -0800
Re: On length contraction Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 08:24 +0100
Re: On length contraction Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:41 +0100
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-06 07:06 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-06 09:20 -0600
Re: On length contraction Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-06 21:43 +0100
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 09:46 -0600
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 15:09 -0600
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 09:49 -0600
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:10 -0800
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 10:01 -0600
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 08:28 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-07 10:57 -0600
Re: On length contraction mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-12-07 22:58 -0800
Re: On length contraction Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-08 08:44 +0100
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-08 14:33 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:56 -0600
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-10 20:07 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 13:13 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 17:19 -0600
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 02:45 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 21:11 -0800
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 06:57 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-11 19:20 -0800
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-11 19:55 +0000
Re: On length contraction Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-11 23:25 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-11 19:25 -0800
Re: On length contraction pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-11 19:48 -0800
Re: On length contraction pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-12-13 14:33 -0800
Re: On length contraction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-12 17:27 +0000
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 10:12 -0600
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 21:08 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-11 08:04 -0600
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-08 14:26 -0800
Re: On length contraction Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-08 22:40 +0000
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-09 06:50 -0800
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-09 09:06 -0800
Re: On length contraction rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 09:47 -0800
Re: On length contraction Plexippus Kritikos <plexik@laertesegidio.org> - 2015-12-09 18:11 +0000
Re: On length contraction Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 12:32 -0600
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-09 11:18 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 06:57 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-10 06:46 -0800
Re: On length contraction wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2015-12-06 18:18 +0100
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-06 12:35 -0600
Re: On length contraction wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2015-12-06 21:58 +0100
Re: On length contraction wugi <brol@brol.be> - 2015-12-06 22:31 +0100
Re: On length contraction Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-07 10:16 -0600
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 13:08 -0800
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 14:26 -0800
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 14:38 -0800
Re: On length contraction John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-06 15:39 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 15:07 -0600
Re: On length contraction benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 02:21 -0500
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 10:44 -0600
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-14 08:59 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-14 09:05 -0800
Re: On length contraction alsor@interia.pl - 2015-12-14 09:48 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 12:18 -0600
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-15 05:49 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 08:21 -0600
Re: On length contraction mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-12-15 23:29 -0800
Re: On length contraction kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-12-16 07:04 -0800
Re: On length contraction Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 09:14 -0600
csiph-web