Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #366564

Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories

From Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories
Followup-To alt.morons
Date 2015-10-09 10:59 +0000
Organization Алёна Батырева Inc
Message-ID <mv86na$915$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <mv6cp0$jjg$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4368209.GPKBEtnK0j@PointedEars.de> <1730284.XuYReIBpc4@PointedEars.de> <mv6oqb$ghj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2452749.ojeSIZT1PQ@PointedEars.de>

Followups directed to: alt.morons

Show all headers | View raw


Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> The ’nym-shifting troll wrote as "Natalina Nazvarova":
> 
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> […]  (The proper time interval for uniform motion in spacetime is
>>>> 
>>>>    ∆τ = √((∆t²) – (∆x_i)²∕c²).
>>> 
>>> Correction:
>>> 
>>>   ∆τ = √((∆t)² – (∆x_i)²∕c²).
>> 
>> Why should it be like that?
> 
> Because the metric of a space is in general
> 
>    ds² = g_µν dx^µ dx^ν

What's this crap?? No tensors content inside the above equality I asked 
about, cretin.

> and in a flat (Minkowski) spacetime (3+1-space) the metric tensor can be
> written as (the matrix)

!! 

[snip loads of crap, misunderstood stuff stolen from whom knows where]

> See also:  <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MetricTensor.html>

Ohh, I see... LOL

>> Real life you MUST always specify that /i/ (plus all the others)
> 
> No, real life includes Einstein notation, also known as Einstein
> summation convention, where repeated indexes (here: i) are summed over:

Has nothing to do with Einstein, pussycat.

[snip more crap]

> Granted, this is not the trivial real *troll* life that you are living,
> where you are blathering about tensors without having the slightest clue

Has nothing to do with tensors, idiot, you dont even know what you wrote. 
Here we go once again

    ∆τ = √((∆t)² – (∆x_i)²∕c²).

No tensors. Which seems to be consistent. As you, an almost half of an 
engineer, are discombobulated when it comes to the domain of tensors.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Necessity Alternate Theories kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-08 13:01 -0400
  Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-08 17:09 +0000
  Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 13:30 -0500
    Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-08 22:45 +0200
      Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-08 22:58 +0200
        Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:56 +0000
          Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-09 06:39 +0200
            Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-09 10:59 +0000
              Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-09 20:29 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-09 18:44 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 09:40 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 12:08 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 05:25 -0700
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 12:37 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-10 14:54 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 06:02 -0700
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 17:49 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:08 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 18:13 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:16 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 19:08 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 18:02 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 20:17 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 18:37 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 20:54 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 19:00 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:40 -0400
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-09 15:31 -0700
  Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-09 02:42 -0400
    Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-09 11:44 +0000
      Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-09 08:00 -0400

csiph-web