Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #366616

Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories

Show all headers | View raw

The ’nym-shifting troll wrote as "Natalina Nazvarova":

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> The ’nym-shifting troll wrote as "Natalina Nazvarova":
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>> […]  (The proper time interval for uniform motion in spacetime is
>>>>> 
>>>>>    ∆τ = √((∆t²) – (∆x_i)²∕c²).
>>>> 
>>>> Correction:
>>>> 
>>>>   ∆τ = √((∆t)² – (∆x_i)²∕c²).
>>> 
>>> Why should it be like that?
>> 
>> Because the metric of a space is in general
>> 
>>    ds² = g_µν dx^µ dx^ν
> 
> What's this crap??

It is the metric …

> No tensors content inside the above equality I asked about, cretin.

… that leads to the equality that I stated, if only you cared to read.

But you do not; you are not interested in the truth, not interested in 
learning, you are just a ‘nym-shifting troll, right?

>> Granted, this is not the trivial real *troll* life that you are living,
>> where you are blathering about tensors without having the slightest clue
> 
> Has nothing to do with tensors,

Yes, it has.  The equation is that way because of the metric of spacetime, 
and because of the signature of the metric tensor of spacetime.

> idiot,

Not pleased to meet you.

> you dont even know what you wrote.

I know.  I also know that either you have not read it, or not understood it, 
or you have both read and understood it and pretend that you did not because 
that would take away your twisted rationale for trolling.  In either case 
further reading your postings, let alone replying to you, appears to be a 
waste of time.  Please prove me wrong there.

> Here we go once again
> 
>     ∆τ = √((∆t)² – (∆x_i)²∕c²).
> 
> No tensors.

Actually, the x_i are the components of a tensor.  This is obvious to anyone 
who has the slightest idea what a tensor is.

> Which seems to be consistent.

Of course it is consistent.  You can read how one must arrive at this by 
reading what I wrote much more carefully than you did, if that.

> As you, an almost half of an engineer, are discombobulated when it comes
> to the domain of tensors.

I had not thought that the gibberish you present here as English could get 
more hilarious, but I was wrong.  So thanks for the laugh and the unlikely 
addition of “discombobulated” to my vocabulary.


PointedEars
-- 
Q: How many theoretical physicists specializing in general relativity
   does it take to change a light bulb?  
A: Two: one to hold the bulb and one to rotate the universe.
(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Necessity Alternate Theories kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-08 13:01 -0400
  Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-08 17:09 +0000
  Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 13:30 -0500
    Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-08 22:45 +0200
      Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-08 22:58 +0200
        Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:56 +0000
          Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-09 06:39 +0200
            Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-09 10:59 +0000
              Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-09 20:29 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-09 18:44 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 09:40 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 12:08 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 05:25 -0700
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 12:37 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-10 14:54 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 06:02 -0700
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 17:49 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:08 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 18:13 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:16 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 19:08 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 18:02 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 20:17 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 18:37 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-10 20:54 +0200
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-10 19:00 +0000
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:40 -0400
                Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-09 15:31 -0700
  Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-09 02:42 -0400
    Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories Natalina Nazvarova <natana42@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-09 11:44 +0000
      Re: The Necessity Alternate Theories kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-09 08:00 -0400

csiph-web