Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #274973

Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled>

From Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled>
Date 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <msd8lk$rtj$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <bc0nbc-a48.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com> <29mdnVxgU9JzmnfInZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me> <N5adneB0uc5NvnfInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/09/2015 00:05, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me...
>> On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion?
>>>>
>>>>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects
>>>>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards.
>>>>
>>>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation,
>>>
>>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from
>>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from?
>>
>> https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf
>
> And just where are the radiation readings?
>
>

The same question I have asked you many times, you have always told us 
about the radiation.

What was the radiation?
How was it recorded?
Who recorded it?

>>>> no seismic signature
>>>
>>> But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it
>>> were a tuning fork.  And to this date nobody has explained why we were
>>> not
>>> allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene
>>> discribed
>>> as if it were a 5.5 quake.
>>>
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic
>>
>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html
>
> Those are inconsistant with the fact the North Tower shook like a tuning
> fork, people started running then and the EMP recorded by an AM receiver by
> WCBS.
>
>

Yes they are, I wonder why that would be?????????


>>>>    no
>>>> EMP
>>>
>>> Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver
>>> operated by WCBS in Nuke York City.
>>>
>>>> no fireball
>>>
>>> Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact
>>> moment a flash would have occured.  Some videos show the smoke jump as if
>>> part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly
>>> skips.
>>>
>>>> no mushroom cloud
>>>
>>> You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers
>>> that are consistant with underground nukes:
>>>
>>>   ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm><
>
>>> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event that
>>> could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded a
>>> sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was
>>> vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a
>>> tuning fork.>  Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where
>>> only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around
>>> 9am.  <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they scrambled
>>> to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5
>>> buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3
>>> and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something coming
>>> from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what they
>>> left behind.  <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11
>>> Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:=========================
>> ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7
>> in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to
>> explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW the
>> fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us anunderground
>> nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as bad
>> as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of
>> fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the
>> contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiationelsewhere.NIST
>> Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
    Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
      Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
      Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
        Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
            Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
              Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
            Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
              Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
        Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
        Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
        Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
        Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
            Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
              Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
                Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
          Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
          Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
  Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
    Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
  Re: Complete bullshit:  NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500

csiph-web