Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274978
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| References | (3 earlier) <mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com> <29mdnVxgU9JzmnfInZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me> <N5adneB0uc5NvnfInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <msd8lk$rtj$2@dont-email.me> |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Date | 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <EYSdnSiqVr4ftXfInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:msd8lk$rtj$2@dont-email.me... > On 05/09/2015 00:05, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me... >>> On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >>>>> >>>>>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose >>>>>> effects >>>>>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. >>>>> >>>>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, >>>> >>>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings >>>> from >>>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >>> >>> https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf >> >> And just where are the radiation readings? >> >> > > The same question I have asked you many times, you have always told us > about the radiation. > > What was the radiation? > How was it recorded? > Who recorded it? You are supposed to tell me you clown. I'm the one that is saying the total lack of any radiation at all at Ground Zero is also a smoking gun because there is radiation everywhere. >>>>> no seismic signature >>>> >>>> But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if >>>> it >>>> were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were >>>> not >>>> allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene >>>> discribed >>>> as if it were a 5.5 quake. >>>> >>> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic >>> >>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html >> >> Those are inconsistant with the fact the North Tower shook like a tuning >> fork, people started running then and the EMP recorded by an AM receiver >> by >> WCBS. >> >> > > Yes they are, I wonder why that would be????????? > > >>>>> no >>>>> EMP >>>> >>>> Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver >>>> operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. >>>> >>>>> no fireball >>>> >>>> Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact >>>> moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as >>>> if >>>> part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that >>>> clearly >>>> skips. >>>> >>>>> no mushroom cloud >>>> >>>> You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin >>>> Towers >>>> that are consistant with underground nukes: >>>> >>>> >>>> ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< >> >>>> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event >>>> that >>>> could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded >>>> a >>>> sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was >>>> vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a >>>> tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where >>>> only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around >>>> 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they >>>> scrambled >>>> to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 >>>> buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 >>>> and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something >>>> coming >>>> from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what >>>> they >>>> left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 >>>> Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:========================= >>> ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of >>> WTC7 >>> in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to >>> explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW >>> the >>> fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us >>> anunderground >>> nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as >>> bad >>> as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of >>> fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the >>> contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's >>> radiationelsewhere.NIST >>> Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc >> >> Rocky Rocky
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500
csiph-web