Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274969
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Date | 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <hNWdnUzqlcXoVnXInZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <20150903185317.00004bdf@uk.mo> <bc0nbc-a48.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com> <29mdnVxgU9JzmnfInZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >> >>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >> >>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >> >>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. >> >> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, > > And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from > Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf > >> no seismic signature > > But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it > were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were not > allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene discribed > as if it were a 5.5 quake. > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html >> no >> EMP > > Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver > operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. > >> no fireball > > Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact > moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as if > part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly > skips. > >> no mushroom cloud > > You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers > that are consistant with underground nukes: > ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm><> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event that could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded a sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they scrambled to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something coming from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what they left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:========================= ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us anunderground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as bad as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiationelsewhere.NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEscRocky > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500
csiph-web