Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms

From	Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Opinion \| The Science of Monster Storms
Date	2015-08-28 15:23 +0200
Organization	Good company
Message-ID	<mrpna4$hce$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <mri3sf$tr8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mri4mb$bau$1@dont-email.me> <mrifqb$ugp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mrinnj$oru$1@dont-email.me> <mrpm2r$655$3@speranza.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/28/2015 03:01 PM, Margarita Cibulkova wrote:
> Poutnik wrote:
> 
>> Dne 25/08/2015 v 21:31 Margarita Cibulkova napsal(a):
>>> Poutnik wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not true. Initial idea, leading to later hypothesis and theory, is
>>>> often conjecture or guess.
>>>
>>> Ideas are not Science, Put. If it were, we would be swimming in
>>> Science.
>>>
>>>> WHAT IF ?? .... Guess can be qualified even implicitly.  Sometimes
>>>> they could be characterized as (qualified) intuition,
>>>> but I suppose such a term is not used.
>>>
>>> No, Put, no. I see you never read Science. You must be believing in the
>>> Divergent Matter Model as well.
>>>  
>> There is possibility of strong misunderstanding between us. 
>> One thing is idea as hypothesis/theory starting point.
>> The other thing is just idea with self-confident statements.
> 
> In other understandable words, you admit you've been blatantly stupid.
> 

Our own words speak for us or against us, not words of others.
And your own words do not speak for you.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes a great man humble, but a small man arrogant.

Thread

Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:45 -0500
  The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-08-25 14:55 +0100
  Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:38 -0500
    Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:45 +0200
      Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:03 -0500
        Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:07 +0000
          Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0200
            1/4 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:33 -0700
            Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:44 -0500
            Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:31 +0000
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:50 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:09 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 15:55 -0500
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 10:45 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:44 -0500
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 12:59 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:18 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:11 -0400
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:21 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:32 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:30 -0700
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "Mike Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-28 18:07 -0700
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:25 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:45 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:13 +0000
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 23:48 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 13:01 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:23 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:38 +0200
  Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700

csiph-web