Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517451
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 10:30 -0700 |
| References | (11 earlier) <mrnb8q$rrf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mrpm0f$655$2@speranza.aioe.org> <4L%Dx.5222$2p1.2476@fx28.iad> <mrq1mj$r8o$1@dont-email.me> <mrq2bl$tma$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <d3d2c3fa-e007-4258-9e08-e8a73a04e0d0@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms |
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 12:32:35 PM UTC-4, Poutnik wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 06:21 PM, Poutnik wrote:
> >
> > The name presented as real name
> > does not give higher credit than nickname,
> > especially if it is real nickname/penname as mine.
> >
> P.S.:
> Many Usenet nymshifters change their "real name" every few days.
Those are not real names. It's funny when lying nym-shifters project
that all others are using fake aliases: {PotLuck, Kettle, Black}
The old #HowCanYourNameBeRealWhenOursCertainlyIsNot?!
> I use my nickname on internet for about 20 years,
> since internet became publicly available in my country.
A nickname is just fine, it's real. My nickname is Paul
> I do not see reason why I should change it.
Given what and how you write, do consider it -- wisely and all.
> In real life, some of my friends even know me better
> under my nickname than real name.
Does anyone really know anyone anymore?!
Regardless, anonymous nym shifters are very eager to post Post
POST. Yet they never ever say anything worthwhile. They only,
deliberately, serve to prevent discussions: Their Unspoken Agenda.
> --
> Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )
>
> Knowledge makes a great man humble, but a small man arrogant.
-- Mahipal "Me: The Sea of Ignorance is deeper than the Well of Knowledge"
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:45 -0500
The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-08-25 14:55 +0100
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:38 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:45 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:03 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:07 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0200
1/4 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:33 -0700
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:44 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:31 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:50 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:09 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 15:55 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 10:45 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:44 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 12:59 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:18 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:11 -0400
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:21 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:32 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:30 -0700
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "Mike Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-28 18:07 -0700
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:25 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:45 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:13 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 23:48 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 13:01 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:23 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:38 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700
csiph-web