Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Opinion \| The Science of Monster Storms
Date	2015-08-25 21:13 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<bc2vac-kii.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <mri3sf$tr8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mri4mb$bau$1@dont-email.me> <mrifqb$ugp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kjvuac-q9i.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <mrik5j$af2$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
>>> Poutnik wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> You both are wrong. There are no guesses in Science. At most there
>>>>> are Qualified Guesses, but not much, or they HAVE to be based on
>>>>> rigurous Studies and Observations.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is not much Science in Speculations.
>>>>> 
>>>> Not true. Initial idea, leading to later hypothesis and theory,
>>>> is often conjecture or guess.
>>> 
>>> Ideas are not Science, Put. If it were, we would be swimming in
>>> Science.
>> 
>> One dead dead give away for a kook is capitalizing things that should
>> not be capitalized, kook.
> 
> No, jimp, it's just you, batshit crazy, weak in Science, Weak in Math and 
> English. Those things has to be "capitalized" taken as domain of 
> significant interest, with significant importance in that particular 
> context.  

One dead dead give away for a kook is capitalizing things that should
not be capitalized, kook.

BTW, what is your first language, as it certainly can not be English, kook.


<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:45 -0500
  The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-08-25 14:55 +0100
  Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:38 -0500
    Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:45 +0200
      Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:03 -0500
        Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:07 +0000
          Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0200
            1/4 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:33 -0700
            Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:44 -0500
            Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:31 +0000
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:50 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:09 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 15:55 -0500
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 10:45 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:44 -0500
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 12:59 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:18 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:11 -0400
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:21 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:32 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:30 -0700
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "Mike Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-28 18:07 -0700
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:25 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:45 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:13 +0000
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 23:48 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 13:01 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:23 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:38 +0200
  Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700

csiph-web