Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #361887

Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes

Show all headers | View raw

On 26.08.2015 07:20, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 11:50:55 AM UTC-7, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>
>> Now I know that you [Koobee Wublee] are but a conspiracy theory crank.
>> Your delusions trumps experimental evidence.
>> That explains why you can keep claiming what is proven to be wrong.
>
> Now, Koobee Wublee is getting very excited.  <shrug>
>
>> Here is one example (amongst many):
>>
>> December 2008 Koobee Wublee wrote (and repeated several times):
>> | The stellar aberration is an
>> | application of the Galilean transform for low speeds.  Since the
>> | Galilean transform satisfies the principle of relativity, the velocity
>> | of the star is very much important in determining this aberration.
>>
>> The fact is that ever since Bradley in 1725 for the fist time
>> measured the stellar aberration, it has been experimentally
>> verified over and over again that stellar aberration depends
>> _only_ on the change of the velocity of the Earth, and of
>> the speed of light. The velocity of the star contributes
>> nothing to stellar aberration.
>
> Paul's understanding is just wrong.  Aberration is strictly
> a phenomenon of velocity thing not of acceleration (change of velocity).  <shrug>
>
>> The fact that the stellar aberration is the same for both
>> components of a binary makes it blazingly clear that
>> the velocities of the components are irrelevant.
>
> So, Paul is the one that is delusional.  <shrug>

I note with interest that Koobee Wublee calls it a delusion
that the stellar aberration is the same for both components
of a binary system.

As I said:
"Koobee Wublee's delutions trumps experimental evidence." :-D


>> But delusions can't be reasoned away.

Thanks for the vivid demonstration of the truth of that statement. :-D

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 18:44 -0700
  Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:50 -0700
    Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:49 -0500
      Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 16:17 -0700
      Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 22:43 -0700
        Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-19 02:30 -0400
          Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 22:01 -0700
            Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-20 02:08 -0400
              Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 20:31 -0700
            Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:54 -0500
              Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:18 -0700
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0200
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 22:20 -0700
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-26 13:14 +0200

csiph-web