Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #361349

Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 22:01:09 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee
<koobee.wublee@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 11:30:24 PM UTC-7, kefischer wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:43:19, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>
>> > There is no such shit as a conspiracy theory in which either a
>> > hypothesis can be supported with observations or not.  Try to
>> > understand what science is all about, and the hint is that there is
>> > no such shit as a conspiracy theory even if a hypothesis is ever so
>> > outrageously politically incorrect.  <shrug>
>>
>> > the main purpose was to blast the ionized particles, trapped by
>> > constantly influx of solar wind, away.  Why?  Because of Kennedy's
>> > pledge to go to the moon a year before Project Starfish Prime.  NASA
>> > knew then it was impossible to go through a radiation belt with that
>> > many charged particles since whenever a charged particle hits anything
>> > metallic, x-ray would be generated, and no living creatures can
>> > withstand that much radiation let alone the microwave-oven effect in
>> > the radiation zone.  <shrug>
>>
>> > At that time, the NASA people were not aware of going through the
>> > magnetic poles with much less radiation but more fuel supply required.
>> > So, upon the failure of the Project Starfish Prime (which is a very
>> > good thing for those of us born around or after that), the only
>> > recourse was to fake the manned moon missions.  Faking the moon landing
>> > would shift budget allocation from science to deceits.  It is much
>> > easier to deceit than science.  <shrug>
>>
>>        You are out of your fucking mind, asshole.
>
>Is reality really that difficult to accept?  <shrug>

         You don't even remember what reality is.
Look at how many high altitude tests there were;

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/hane.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests


         The size of the Apollo program was huge,
there is no way the government would have
spent that much money on a ruse.

         You are not the only conspiracy nut,
but conspiracy theories are not your only
problem.
         Any time more than a few dozen people
are involved in a project, it can't be faked,
a certain percentage of people will make
the truth known regardless of the penalty.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 18:44 -0700
  Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:50 -0700
    Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:49 -0500
      Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 16:17 -0700
      Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 22:43 -0700
        Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-19 02:30 -0400
          Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 22:01 -0700
            Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-20 02:08 -0400
              Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 20:31 -0700
            Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:54 -0500
              Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:18 -0700
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0200
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 22:20 -0700
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-26 13:14 +0200

csiph-web