Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #361823

Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes

Show all headers | View raw

On 25.08.2015 09:18, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 7:55:01 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Koobee Wublee wrote:
>
>>> There is no such shit as a conspiracy theory in which either a
>>> hypothesis can be supported with observations or not.  Try to
>>> understand what science is all about, and the hint is that there is
>>> no such shit as a conspiracy theory even if a hypothesis is ever so
>>> outrageously politically incorrect.  <shrug>
>>
>>> the main purpose was to blast the ionized particles, trapped by
>>> constantly influx of solar wind, away.  Why?  Because of Kennedy's
>>> pledge to go to the moon a year before Project Starfish Prime.  NASA
>>> knew then it was impossible to go through a radiation belt with that
>>> many charged particles since whenever a charged particle hits anything
>>> metallic, x-ray would be generated, and no living creatures can
>>> withstand that much radiation let alone the microwave-oven effect in
>>> the radiation zone.  <shrug>
>>
>>> At that time, the NASA people were not aware of going through the
>>> magnetic poles with much less radiation but more fuel supply required.
>>> So, upon the failure of the Project Starfish Prime (which is a very
>>> good thing for those of us born around or after that), the only
>>> recourse was to fake the manned moon missions.  Faking the moon landing
>>> would shift budget allocation from science to deceits.  It is much
>>> easier to deceit than science.  <shrug>
>>
>> There is no point in trying to reason away a delusion, Koobee.
>
> What delusion?  <shrug>

The delusion you demonstrated above was an eye opener for me.
Now I know that you are but a conspiracy theory crank.
Your delusions trumps experimental evidence.

That explains why you can keep claiming what is proven to be wrong.

Here is one example (amongst many):

December 2008 Koobee Wublee wrote (and repeated several times):
| The stellar aberration is an
| application of the Galilean transform for low speeds.  Since the
| Galilean transform satisfies the principle of relativity, the velocity
| of the star is very much important in determining this aberration.

The fact is that ever since Bradley in 1725 for the fist time
measured the stellar aberration, it has been experimentally
verified over and over again that stellar aberration depends
_only_ on the change of the velocity of the Earth, and of
the speed of light. The velocity of the star contributes
nothing to stellar aberration.
The fact that the stellar aberration is the same for both
components of a binary makes it blazingly clear that
the velocities of the components are irrelevant.

But delusions can't be reasoned away.

https://paulba.no/pdf/Stellar_aberration.pdf

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 18:44 -0700
  Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 20:50 -0700
    Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 07:49 -0500
      Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 16:17 -0700
      Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 22:43 -0700
        Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-19 02:30 -0400
          Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 22:01 -0700
            Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-20 02:08 -0400
              Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 20:31 -0700
            Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:54 -0500
              Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:18 -0700
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-25 20:50 +0200
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 22:20 -0700
                Re: Nuclear testing at high altitudes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-26 13:14 +0200

csiph-web