Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516850
| From | Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms |
| Date | 2015-08-25 20:09 +0000 |
| Organization | Biosphere |
| Message-ID | <mrii1r$4oa$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <mri3k2$t2o$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mri3sf$tr8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mri4mb$bau$1@dont-email.me> <mrifqb$ugp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mrigqs$tpu$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Poutnik wrote: > Dne 25/08/2015 v 21:31 Margarita Cibulkova napsal(a): >> Poutnik wrote: >> >>>> You both are wrong. There are no guesses in Science. At most there >>>> are Qualified Guesses, but not much, or they HAVE to be based on >>>> rigurous Studies and Observations. >>>> >>>> There is not much Science in Speculations. >>>> >>> Not true. Initial idea, leading to later hypothesis and theory, >>> is often conjecture or guess. >> >> Ideas are not Science, Put. If it were, we would be swimming in >> Science. > > Neither a finger is a person. Just a part of a person. > BTW, are you not able to reproduce the nicknam properly, > or are you so socially limited doing it intentionally on purpose ? BTW what? Ohh sorry, Pout. > You are an obvious nymshifter, as women have better things to do. I'm actually cooking right now. Good guess, Pout. >> No, Put, no. I see you never read Science. You must be believing in the >> Divergent Matter Model as well. > > Naive and stupid trolling attempt. > Next time try something more sophisticated. Stupid you say, Pout? Did you ever read guesses in scientific papers, Pout? Who is the stupid now, Pout? > Ask DMM author himself, if I am follower of opponent of his idea. What do you mean by "author", there are no authors. Authors to what, Pout, are you with me?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:45 -0500
The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-08-25 14:55 +0100
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:38 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:45 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:03 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:07 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0200
1/4 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:33 -0700
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:44 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:31 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:50 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:09 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 15:55 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 10:45 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:44 -0500
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 12:59 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:18 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:11 -0400
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:21 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:32 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:30 -0700
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "Mike Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-28 18:07 -0700
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:25 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:45 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:13 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 23:48 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 13:01 +0000
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:23 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:38 +0200
Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700
csiph-web