Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #516796

Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms

From gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms
Date 2015-08-25 11:44 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <mri61v$3kb$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <mri26h$ont$3@speranza.aioe.org> <mri2f0$1eq$1@dont-email.me> <mri3k2$t2o$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mri3sf$tr8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mri4mb$bau$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/25/2015 11:23 AM, Poutnik wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 06:07 PM, Margarita Cibulkova wrote:
>> gilber34 wrote:
>>
>>>> Conjectures and guessings are part of science,
>>>> as first steps behind the known,
>>>> to shift the boundaries of unknown.
>>>>
>>>            problem here is, none of it is known to be fact, and the
>>> wording is vague innuendo, not scientific at all. Like most of the
>>> global worming articals that Wormley is c+p - ing

>>> it is assumptions on top of guessing, models upon models, and when you
>>> dig down, you find the foundation is sand, no real facts.
>>
>> You both are wrong. There are no guesses in Science. At most there are
>> Qualified Guesses, but not much, or they HAVE to be based on rigurous
>> Studies and Observations.

>> There is not much Science in Speculations.
>>
>
> Not true.
> Initial idea, leading to later hypothesis and theory,
> is often conjecture or guess.

> WHAT IF ?? .....
>
> Guess can be qualified even implicitly. :-)
> Sometimes they could be characterized as (qualified) intuition,
> but I suppose such a term is not used.
>

REM scientific method...  assume, test, hypothisis testing, etc....

I dont see that in most all of the GW articals, just model malipations

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 08:45 -0500
  The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-08-25 14:55 +0100
  Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:38 -0500
    Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:45 +0200
      Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:03 -0500
        Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:07 +0000
          Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 18:23 +0200
            1/4 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:33 -0700
            Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:44 -0500
            Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:31 +0000
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:50 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:09 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 15:55 -0500
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 10:45 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:44 -0500
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 12:59 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:18 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:11 -0400
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:21 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:32 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 10:30 -0700
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "Mike Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-08-28 18:07 -0700
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:25 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:45 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:13 +0000
              Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 23:48 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-28 13:01 +0000
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:23 +0200
                Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 15:38 +0200
  Re: Opinion | The Science of Monster Storms "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 11:32 -0700

csiph-web