Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE

From	"NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE
Date	2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<mplppc$igi$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<611a2dfe-ccf5-4e9a-988a-afb1e28e42ab@googlegroups.com> <mZWdnSdQhIwNvyPInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mpl97f$4gu$1@dont-email.me> <Ld2dnV_RDJF1qiPInZ2dnUVZ5gednZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Hägar"  wrote in message 
news:Ld2dnV_RDJF1qiPInZ2dnUVZ5gednZ2d@giganews.com...

"HVAC"  wrote in message news:mpl97f$4gu$1@dont-email.me...

On 8/2/2015 10:00 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>     What's false and what's not, is determined by the hard data of
>     observation and experiment. To date, there has NEVER been an
>     observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general
>     relativity. Einstein's relativity remains a fruitful tool of
>     classical physics.

Not if you're a kook.

Just read the posts written by BJ, AA, John, Bert, etc.
They view science as the wool that is being pulled over our (the
sheeple) eyes. To them, observation and experiment are tricks we
scientists deploy. Since ESP, et al cannot be proven under lab
conditions, that means the conditions are the problem. They seek a
new,
less rigid manner of testing.

*** And preferably a method by which any pseudo science hack
can qualify for that much coveted Nobel Prize.
Obama ushered in the new era of marginal requirements by
simply being a "well-spoken" Nigger ...

******************************
It's a shame there isn't a prize for "well-spoken" Crackers because you're 
halfway there having mastered the Cracker requirement.

Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 10:26 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 09:29 -0500
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:15 -0400
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 09:36 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 12:28 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 11:12 -0700
        Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-08-03 13:03 -0500
          Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:35 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:56 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 08:31 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE "NotTroll2Ol5" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-08-02 14:07 -0500
      Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-02 12:38 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-02 11:40 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-03 11:36 -0400

csiph-web