Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #7896

Re: [CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles

From Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.misc, alt.privacy
Subject Re: [CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles
Date 2015-06-13 21:49 +0000
Organization My Linux Box
Message-ID <mli8i5$3hc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <mlf90u$e36$1@solani.org> <871thgvjzx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <slrnmnoh2e.qit.catwheezel@ID-107770.user.individual.net> <20150613151946@news.eternal-september.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.misc Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote:
> On 2015-06-13, Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote:
> > How long before some government or other decrees that not carrying
> > a mobile phone handset, switched on, is 'suspect' and then a little
> > later 'illegal'?

> Once implants are available it will only be a matter of time before
> they are mandated. It will be sold to the public as being
> "convenient" and "fun."

>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUa3np4CKC4

Sadly, they likely won't need to be mandated.  Most of the lemmings
will just submit for the promise of being able to 'auto update their
facebook wall with their comings and goings'.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-12 18:39 +0000
  Re: [CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2015-06-12 21:50 +0300
    Re: [CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2015-06-13 14:55 +0000
      Re: [CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2015-06-13 19:19 +0000
        Re: [CM] more on Stingray: 2 articles Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-06-13 21:49 +0000

csiph-web