Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #287362

Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1%

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/1/2015 9:27 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 7:01:05 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
>> On 4/1/2015 11:47 AM, vallor wrote:
>>> On 04/01/2015 06:32 AM, Slimer wrote:
>>>> On 2015-04-01 8:32 AM, DFS wrote:
>>>>> On 3/31/2015 5:52 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>>> (And a side note: Visits from devices running Linux account for a
>>>>>>> number
>>>>>>> equal to almost exactly 1 percent of all desktop traffic, although it
>>>>>>> appears that the government lumps Linux in with the mobile category for
>>>>>>> some reason.)
>>>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/which-operating-systems-and-browsers-are-most-popular-in-the-u-s/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Windows worldwide: **************************************************
>>>>>>>                      ****************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Linux worldwide:   *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heh!  Funny visual!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here, I plotted that for you
>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/65hvgOD.png
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Beautiful!
>>>>>
>>>>> Must've come out of the (b)owl(s) of LibreOffice.  You have to work hard
>>>>> to make MS Office graphs look that bad.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like something made in Microsoft Paint inside of Windows 2.0.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You people can't be this stupid.
>>>
>>> You snip the part where he shows that he's using R, then post crap about
>>> "duhuh, liboffice!"
>>>
>>>      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(programming_language)
>>
>>
>> Other than the ugly, 4th-grader looks and spelling, what was the
>> evidence his 'graph' was produced using GuhNoo-licensed R crapware?
>
> Probably the "R" (note it's uppercase!). LOL!

What R?  All I see is a plain pie chart and a misspelled header ("Teh 
Doze and friends")

edit: I went back up the thread.  Because of the brackets, his R code 
looked like a thread quote and I ignored it.


owl@thinkpad:~/chart$ R -q --file=script.r
> slices<-read.csv(file="data.csv",header=FALSE,sep=",")
> lbls<-c("Doze","Linux","Mack","Other")
> cols<-c("blue","red","pink","gray")
> png("chart.png")
> pie(as.numeric(slices),labels=lbls,col=cols,main="Teh Doze and friends")
> dev.off()
null device
           1
> q()
owl@thinkpad:~/chart$



ugh.  I figured it was some kind of command-line crapware.




> Looks like he could use a dose of:
>
> https://plot.ly/r/
>
> If you're into such things, that's actually a pretty cool site if you look around and play with the examples.

Pretty sweet.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:48 -0400
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:54 -0700
    Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:55 +0100
      Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 04:54 -0700
        Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:52 +0100
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 05:06 -0700
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 21:52 +0000
    Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
      Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:32 -0400
        Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:47 -0700
          Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:54 -0400
          Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
            Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:27 -0700
              Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:13 -0400
            Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:45 -0400
      Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 19:20 +0000
        Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
          Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 02:49 +0000
            Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:25 -0400
              Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:56 +0000
  Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Debbie Ballard <debbie1ballard@gmail.com> - 2015-04-13 16:39 -0700
    Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 20:04 -0400

csiph-web