Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #287126
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% |
| Date | 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mfgog7$34c$5@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mfcqrl$5iv$4@dont-email.me> <bbhvue93.ap3@rooftop.invalid> |
On 3/31/2015 5:52 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> <quote> >> (And a side note: Visits from devices running Linux account for a number >> equal to almost exactly 1 percent of all desktop traffic, although it >> appears that the government lumps Linux in with the mobile category for >> some reason.) >> </quote> > >> http://www.zdnet.com/article/which-operating-systems-and-browsers-are-most-popular-in-the-u-s/ > > >> Windows worldwide: ************************************************** >> **************************************** > >> Linux worldwide: * > > >> heh! Funny visual! > > Here, I plotted that for you > http://i.imgur.com/65hvgOD.png Beautiful! Must've come out of the (b)owl(s) of LibreOffice. You have to work hard to make MS Office graphs look that bad.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:48 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:54 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:55 +0100
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 04:54 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:52 +0100
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 05:06 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 21:52 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:32 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:47 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:54 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:27 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:13 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:45 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 19:20 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 02:49 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:56 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Debbie Ballard <debbie1ballard@gmail.com> - 2015-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 20:04 -0400
csiph-web