Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #287358
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% |
| Date | 2015-04-02 02:49 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <hgue0.aa4pa@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <mfcqrl$5iv$4@dont-email.me> <bbhvue93.ap3@rooftop.invalid> <mfgog7$34c$5@dont-email.me> <bvhd03.apf3@rooftop.invalid> <mfi4bt$l3u$3@dont-email.me> |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 4/1/2015 3:20 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/31/2015 5:52 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> <quote>
>>>>> (And a side note: Visits from devices running Linux account for a number
>>>>> equal to almost exactly 1 percent of all desktop traffic, although it
>>>>> appears that the government lumps Linux in with the mobile category for
>>>>> some reason.)
>>>>> </quote>
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/which-operating-systems-and-browsers-are-most-popular-in-the-u-s/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Windows worldwide: **************************************************
>>>>> ****************************************
>>>>
>>>>> Linux worldwide: *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> heh! Funny visual!
>>>>
>>>> Here, I plotted that for you
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/65hvgOD.png
>>
>>
>>> Beautiful!
>>
>>> Must've come out of the (b)owl(s) of LibreOffice. You have to work hard
>>> to make MS Office graphs look that bad.
>>
>> It was supposed to be gray-scale, but teh Mack wouldn't cooperate.
>> But R far surpasses anything DOZE OFFice can do :)
> I can tell...
Dood, how much effort do you expect me to put into a cola joke?
Linux, Doze, and Mack walk into a bar [five pages later... punch line]?
> If what you showed is any indication, it's another user-unfriendly,
> command-line GuhNoo dud.
> Here's something to make it more fun:
> http://www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio/download/
I actually pasted the code from a different job.
The cols line for the chart I posted was actually:
cols<-c("gray50","gray60","pink","gray20")
> Learn SAS and earn cash. Learn R get job in bar.
You don't know me very well if you think I would want to crunch numbers
for a living.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:48 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:54 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:55 +0100
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 04:54 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:52 +0100
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 05:06 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 21:52 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:32 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:47 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:54 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:27 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:13 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:45 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 19:20 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 02:49 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:56 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Debbie Ballard <debbie1ballard@gmail.com> - 2015-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 20:04 -0400
csiph-web