Re: revisiting a prgramming problem

From	rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: revisiting a prgramming problem
Date	2014-12-02 02:47 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<m5jqqk$dk6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <5446bef7$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <m2blr1$m7c$1@dont-email.me> <1542736d-0bc5-404a-9481-c38ae60c394b@googlegroups.com> <m5dsjk$ptj$2@dont-email.me> <766ef7c8-49ad-4d97-8e50-1beb89b7d673@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/2/2014 1:43 AM, the_gavino_himself wrote:
> On Saturday, November 29, 2014 8:41:24 PM UTC-5, rickman wrote:
>> On 11/9/2014 12:33 AM, the_gavino_himself wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:44:40 PM UTC-7, rickman wrote:
>>>> On 10/21/2014 4:18 PM, Hans Bezemer wrote:
>>>>> Paul Rubin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> Duh.. : sumofsquare over max dup * >r max dup * r> + ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 2 3 sumofsquare . 13  ok
>>>>>> 2 3 1 sumofsquare . 18  ok
>>>>> Darn, that was the only iteration I didn't test ;-)
>>>>> Back to the drawing board!
>>>>
>>>> Not trying to pick on anyone, but this illustrates the fallacy of
>>>> testing to prove the absence of errors.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>
>>> What is better way to reduce errors?
>>
>> Non-sequitur...
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rick
>
> logically follows, you said above is bad, so what then is good?

The statement you just made is not correct.  Read my post again until 
you understand what is wrong with what you wrote.

-- 

Rick

Thread

revisiting a prgramming problem gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2014-10-14 15:55 -0700
  Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-14 18:52 -0700
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 17:58 +0200
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-21 09:09 -0700
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 22:18 +0200
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-23 15:44 -0400
            Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-23 17:01 -0400
            Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 21:33 -0800
              Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 20:40 -0500
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-01 22:43 -0800
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 02:47 -0500
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-12-02 11:53 +0000
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:23 -0800
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 09:01 -0500
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 22:25 +0200
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-21 16:10 -0700
            Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 21:41 -0800
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 22:30 +0200
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-01 22:45 -0800
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 23:04 +0200
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 10:17 -0700
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-22 02:13 -0400
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-21 23:26 -0700
            Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-22 16:18 +0100
              Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-22 21:27 +0200
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-24 10:30 +0000
                Optimal comparisons for m maximums from n items  (was Re: revisiting a prgramming problem) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-24 16:29 +0100
                Re: Optimal comparisons for m maximums from n items  (was Re: revisiting a prgramming problem) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-25 08:27 +0000
                Re: Optimal comparisons for m maximums from n items (was Re: revisiting a prgramming problem) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-25 18:54 +0100
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-25 13:28 +0200
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-25 14:28 +0200
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-25 15:17 +0200
            Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Gerry Jackson <spam@qlikz.org> - 2014-10-22 21:57 +0100
              Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-22 14:06 -0700
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-23 00:03 +0200
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-23 14:46 +0000
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-23 08:16 -0700
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-23 19:21 +0100
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-23 20:02 +0100
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-23 20:29 +0000
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2014-10-23 22:23 +0200
              Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-23 00:36 +0200
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2014-10-24 10:44 +0100
              Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-22 17:26 -0700
                Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-23 00:02 -0700
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 23:10 -0800
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 21:42 -0800
  Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Roger Levy <roger.levy@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 08:18 -0700
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Roger Levy <roger.levy@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 08:18 -0700
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem november.nihal@gmail.com - 2014-10-15 08:57 -0700
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2014-10-15 17:10 +0100
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-17 21:53 -0400
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Roger Levy <roger.levy@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 08:19 -0700
  Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-22 00:30 +0200
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-21 16:07 -0700
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-22 03:23 +0200
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-22 02:15 -0400
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-22 12:52 +0200
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-22 17:19 -0700
          Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-23 16:10 +0200
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-22 02:14 -0400
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 23:21 -0800
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-06 02:34 +0000
      Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-27 08:00 +0000
        Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-12-27 05:15 -0800
  Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 17:20 +0000
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 12:00 -0800
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-02 16:15 +0000
  Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Sephton <prsephton@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:06 -0800
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Sephton <prsephton@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:14 -0800
    Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:24 -0800

csiph-web