Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #34124
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: revisiting a prgramming problem |
| Date | 2014-10-23 17:01 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <op.xn7bckhamk81un@localhost> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <43dda9f8-27b0-4014-aa4a-9d534193ba1a@googlegroups.com> <5446822d$0$2885$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <7xsiih2yn3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <5446bef7$0$2838$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <m2blr1$m7c$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:44:10 -0400, rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/21/2014 4:18 PM, Hans Bezemer wrote: >> Paul Rubin wrote: >>> Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Duh.. : sumofsquare over max dup * >r max dup * r> + ; >>> >>> 1 2 3 sumofsquare . 13 ok >>> 2 3 1 sumofsquare . 18 ok >> Darn, that was the only iteration I didn't test ;-) >> Back to the drawing board! > > Not trying to pick on anyone, [...] You not picking on someone? And, within this semi-hostile group? ... OK. Alex W. is now complaining about Hugh, but Alex M. isn't. > [...] but this illustrates the fallacy of testing to prove the absence > of errors. Well, testing worked for me, and I'm definately pro-C. So, I think that disproves that claim. Rather, it indicates that: 1) failures which can occur do (Murphy's law), or 2) it confirms Knuth's quip on premature optimization. The use of the word "premature" in this context conveys extra meaning, alluding to sexual failure, insulting the technique. Most people would simply use the word "early". Personally, I see the failure as the latter case. If Hans and others hadn't been attempting to produce the most compact or fastest representation, they might've produced something which was easier to verify and safer to implement, and which is more likely to be correct even without any testing. Somehow, we can't seem to escape the "laws" lately... Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
revisiting a prgramming problem gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2014-10-14 15:55 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-14 18:52 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 17:58 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-21 09:09 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 22:18 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-23 15:44 -0400
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-23 17:01 -0400
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 21:33 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 20:40 -0500
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-01 22:43 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 02:47 -0500
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-12-02 11:53 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:23 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 09:01 -0500
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 22:25 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-21 16:10 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 21:41 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 22:30 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-01 22:45 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 23:04 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-10-21 10:17 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-22 02:13 -0400
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-21 23:26 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-22 16:18 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-22 21:27 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-24 10:30 +0000
Optimal comparisons for m maximums from n items (was Re: revisiting a prgramming problem) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-24 16:29 +0100
Re: Optimal comparisons for m maximums from n items (was Re: revisiting a prgramming problem) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-25 08:27 +0000
Re: Optimal comparisons for m maximums from n items (was Re: revisiting a prgramming problem) "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-25 18:54 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-25 13:28 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-25 14:28 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2014-10-25 15:17 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Gerry Jackson <spam@qlikz.org> - 2014-10-22 21:57 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-22 14:06 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-23 00:03 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-23 14:46 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-23 08:16 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-23 19:21 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2014-10-23 20:02 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-23 20:29 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2014-10-23 22:23 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-23 00:36 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2014-10-24 10:44 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-22 17:26 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-23 00:02 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 23:10 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 21:42 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Roger Levy <roger.levy@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 08:18 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Roger Levy <roger.levy@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 08:18 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem november.nihal@gmail.com - 2014-10-15 08:57 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2014-10-15 17:10 +0100
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-17 21:53 -0400
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Roger Levy <roger.levy@gmail.com> - 2014-10-15 08:19 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-22 00:30 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-21 16:07 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-22 03:23 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-22 02:15 -0400
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-22 12:52 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-22 17:19 -0700
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem awegel@arcor.de (Alexander Wegel) - 2014-10-23 16:10 +0200
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-22 02:14 -0400
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-08 23:21 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-06 02:34 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-27 08:00 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-12-27 05:15 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-29 17:20 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-11-29 12:00 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-02 16:15 +0000
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Sephton <prsephton@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:06 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem Paul Sephton <prsephton@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:14 -0800
Re: revisiting a prgramming problem the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 05:24 -0800
csiph-web