Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #12730
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: magic number for mcrypt |
| Date | 2014-11-17 23:02 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <m4egd3$6mq$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <m4asb0$f70$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m4b1o5$t1c$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m4b7nc$mij$1@dont-email.me> <m4dqcf$iro$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m4e16p$258$1@dont-email.me> |
"William Unruh" <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote in message
news:m4e16p$258$1@dont-email.me...
[...]
> I see a bunch of incoherent sentence fragments.
And its been awhile and I don't remember my grammer well. But you can
bet after you bringing this up to me that I will be checking it out.
>>
>> This is also a warning to those new to usenet. about Usenet. Or
>> USENET.
>> Oops, I guess I shouted. The leader needs to make a decision.
>
> What leader? You have entirely the wrong image of what Usenet is.
I was lurking around one day and overread a discussion about the future
of usenet. It was interesting the opinions. My ISP after a long time did
away with their server. I asked why and they said it wasn't being used. And
they're not alone. These "suggestions" put usenet at the bottom of the list.
Well to express my opinion I see usenet slowly drying up. It's a shame too.
And your saying things are a trade off good and bad is insightful. I say
even to slightly not worth it. Following the suggestions does not work too
well for me.
And to your question "What leader?" Their seems to be an old fart that
decides who is sincere and who isn't. (Some groups are worse than others.)
some rally to him others don't. A group of better and less than better.
That's what I see quite a bit of.
Bill
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-15 18:30 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-15 18:27 -0800
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-15 21:54 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-15 19:02 -0800
Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-15 19:08 -0800
Re: magic number for mcrypt gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-11-16 06:52 +0000
Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-16 01:10 -0800
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-16 14:01 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2014-11-16 11:56 -0800
Re: magic number for mcrypt Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2014-11-18 03:50 +0000
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 23:56 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-16 15:34 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-11-16 22:16 +0000
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 16:47 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-11-17 23:43 +0000
Re: magic number for mcrypt Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-11-18 00:36 +0000
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 23:02 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-11-16 17:39 -0800
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 16:22 -0500
Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-16 13:59 -0500
csiph-web