Re: magic number for mcrypt

From	William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: magic number for mcrypt
Date	2014-11-16 22:16 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<m4b7nc$mij$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <m493kl$nd4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <546813E3.1070205@thadlabs.com> <54681541.4070306@thadlabs.com> <m4asb0$f70$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m4b1o5$t1c$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-11-16, Bill Cunningham <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote:
>>> "Thad Floryan" <thad@thadlabs.com> wrote in >>message 
>>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
><OT>
>
>     The above mentioned usenet "rules" site proves just how intrinsically 
> "irrelevant" usenet is or has become because of itself. NO ONE can possibly 
> follow all rules at all times. It boils down to "classes" the in-group or 
> out-group. I ninety percent of the time lurk usenet, I don't particularly 
> like usenet.

The smart-questions "rules" (which are not rules) is a set of
suggestions as to how to frame your questions so that you have a chance
of getting helpful replies. If you do not want to get helpful replies,
for example your post is just a way of venting your frustration, it
would help to let others know that so they need not waste their time
trying to help. 

>
>     The outgroup not being as good or well off as the in group can't get by 
> sometimes with a typo. While the in-grouper says as he pleases. I think we 
> all really know this. And "trolls" or accused trolls proves there isn't a 
> "sixth sense" among the in-group that tells all.

It has nothing to do with out or in groups, or with finances. I have no
idea if you are on welfare or earn a million dollars a day, nor do I
want to know. 
>
></OT>
>
>

Thread

magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-15 18:30 -0500
  Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-15 18:27 -0800
    Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-15 21:54 -0500
      Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-15 19:02 -0800
        Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-15 19:08 -0800
          Re: magic number for mcrypt gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-11-16 06:52 +0000
            Re: magic number for mcrypt Thad Floryan <thad@thadlabs.com> - 2014-11-16 01:10 -0800
          Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-16 14:01 -0500
            Re: magic number for mcrypt Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2014-11-16 11:56 -0800
              Re: magic number for mcrypt Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2014-11-18 03:50 +0000
                Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 23:56 -0500
            Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-16 15:34 -0500
              Re: magic number for mcrypt William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-11-16 22:16 +0000
                Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 16:47 -0500
                Re: magic number for mcrypt William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-11-17 23:43 +0000
                Re: magic number for mcrypt Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-11-18 00:36 +0000
                Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 23:02 -0500
              Re: magic number for mcrypt Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-11-16 17:39 -0800
                Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-17 16:22 -0500
        Re: magic number for mcrypt "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-11-16 13:59 -0500

csiph-web