Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #33695

Re: Metrics on stack usage

From Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Metrics on stack usage
Date 2014-10-05 02:27 +0200
Organization 1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID <m0q39c$68s$1@online.de> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <SLKdnYBFVtl4l7zJnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@supernews.com> <m0hrik$ep8$1@online.de> <7xk34jjs9f.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <m0jloq$tl$1@online.de> <7xsij5c2di.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Paul Rubin wrote:
> I think the interactive approach runs out of steam once the program gets
> complicated enough.  And in a message a few days ago you compared your
> results with your Verilog b16 implementation, vs. Chuck's F18 that he
> did with his Forth tools involving a heck of a lot more effort and at
> best comparable final output.  That shows that big software like the
> Verilog toolchain really does have its benefits.  But for it to exist,
> someone has to write and test and maintain it, and that means techniques
> for doing such things are worthy of study.

Actually, the Verilog toolchain has its checks, which are absolutely 
essential to find all the bugs, and the checker programs are completely 
separate - you do a formal comparison of the netlist vs. your original 
behavioral Verilog (checking if the synthesis tool did its job), you do a 
static timing analysis with a sign-off analysis tool (a different tool, 
written by someone else, even though the synthesis tool contains a static 
timing analysis) and you have a DRC (desing rule check)+LVS (layout vs. 
schematic) checker to verify that the place&route did its job.  Each time!

And you do that, because the complex toolchain is actually not very well 
debugged.  And it's usually written in some lower level language, because 
performance matters, i.e. most of these Haskell or Coq approaches aren't 
even taken.  Not even the Forth ones.  The level of buggyness in these large 
tools had been pretty high; the key to make these tools actually work is 
usually to figure out how to make the essential core smaller, so that it 
just works.

Example: at one point in time during my design career, I was really pissed 
how long the LVS took to verify one of my chips.  It took hours.  I started 
thinking about how I would do LVS.  You start with two flat netlists which 
contains transistors, diodes, resistors, capacitors and nets to connect 
them.  You have to check if these match.

My idea was to proceed as follows: Repeatedly refine doing the following:

1. Put the nets into bins, by number of connections to different device 
terminals (at start, all device terminals of a particular type, e.g. a PMOS 
gate, are "equal").

2. Put the devices into bins, by net type attached to them (by putting the 
nets into bins, you make the nets starting to become different).

I've done some tests with that idea; I haven't written the complete tool, 
because removing devices which aren't to be checked and collapsing parallel 
structures would also have been part of that exercise.  But the matching 
part ran a 100 times faster than the big expensive tool, and it really was a 
small program.  The reason why I didn't complete that program was that we 
bought a fast LVS tool from some other vendor, which also ran much faster, 
and apparently used a similar algorithm - so this stuff had already been 
done, and I didn't have to do it myself.

To be fair with Chuck: His OKAD is from the 1990s.  And it does produce 
considerably better results than the big bloated tools from the 1990s - with 
considerably more effort, but up to a few years ago, "do it manually" was 
considered "the way" for high-performance CPUs.  But the world has moved on, 
and several of these "tough" problems to do synthesis, place and route, and 
so on, have been solved, or at least become considerably faster and less 
buggy - and if you see such progress, it's usually, because someone had an 
idea how to make it considerably simpler.

Therefore, my advice is, when you are in the situation of having some old 
and complicated code which you can't understand: Throw it away.  Just throw 
it away - after you understood the problem and found a much simpler 
solution.  It's worth the time to check if you can't do it much simpler, 
faster and less bug-prone, and if you are clever, you will end up with a 
much better solution.  Without the maintenance nightmare.

I think the essence of your mistake is that you assume this code *has* to be 
that complex, just because it actually is complex (you asume that complexity 
is all essential, and not, as Brooks noted, mostly accidential).  And that 
because it is complex, it has been verified and maintained with the method 
you prefer: static typechecking.  That's a non sequitur, it hasn't, it has 
been written in a language which doesn't do much typechecking.  And it has 
been tested with a testing approach that doesn't test a lot, apart from the 
actual final output.  And that's why it took long to develop and costs a 
fortune, and the maintenance team is just pushing the bugs from one side to 
the other, and never really fixes them (until some clever startup replaces 
the entire program with something considerably simpler, which fortunately 
happens from time to time).

The magic of bug-free code is to make things simple.  Especially in the 
Haskell context, I completely fail to understand how you can trust a huge, 
buggy bloatware like GHC to compile and check your program.  It's not like 
GHC has just a few bugs, it has more than a thousand open tickets:

https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/

of which nearly a thousand are bugs.  And of course, that's all written in 
Haskell, and if I understood you correctly, the type system makes all these 
bugs disapear by miracle.

Of course, GHC is a big pile of old, complicated code.

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 11:22 -0400
  Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 11:41 -0400
    Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 13:20 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 13:39 -0400
        Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 15:11 -0400
          Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-16 17:24 -0400
            Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-17 17:58 -0400
  Re: Metrics on stack usage barrym95838@yahoo.com - 2014-09-16 08:47 -0700
    Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 14:41 -0400
    Re: Metrics on stack usage "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-09-16 18:55 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-16 14:33 -1000
        Re: Metrics on stack usage barrym95838@yahoo.com - 2014-09-16 18:30 -0700
  Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-16 15:44 +0000
    Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 13:22 -0400
  Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-16 09:18 -0700
    Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 15:39 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-16 09:41 -1000
      Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-16 16:11 -0700
        Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-17 16:34 -0400
        Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 17:26 -0400
          Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-19 07:21 -0400
            Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-19 10:01 -0400
              Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-19 07:42 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-19 14:46 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-19 08:09 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 03:41 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-20 15:31 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 14:53 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-22 16:44 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 15:52 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-09-30 00:08 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 04:26 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-22 10:48 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-22 12:26 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-22 17:07 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-17 07:20 +0000
        Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-17 17:03 -0400
          Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-18 11:40 +0000
            Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-19 09:56 -0400
            Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-22 10:54 -0400
              Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-22 15:13 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-22 13:58 -0400
              Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-22 11:13 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-22 21:59 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-22 16:57 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 00:59 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-22 19:53 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-23 03:48 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-23 16:01 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-23 08:07 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-09-23 22:11 +0100
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-23 16:22 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-23 11:28 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-24 11:56 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-24 13:52 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-24 17:00 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-24 17:04 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-24 16:08 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-24 12:23 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-29 19:33 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-25 10:02 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-25 18:48 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-24 16:58 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-24 16:02 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-24 19:14 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-29 10:15 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-24 13:54 -1000
                Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-09-24 21:07 -0400
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-24 15:25 -1000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-24 18:43 -0700
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-24 16:08 -1000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 01:11 -0700
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-01 09:53 -0700
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-29 13:38 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-29 17:53 -0700
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-30 09:13 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-30 22:37 -0700
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-10-03 16:10 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-03 08:42 -1000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-03 14:59 -0400
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-03 09:07 -1000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-03 17:28 -0400
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-10-04 11:15 -0700
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Marc Olschok <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2014-10-07 23:37 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-07 15:07 -1000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Marc Olschok <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2014-10-11 23:32 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-12 03:03 +0200
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-10-12 10:42 -0500
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-13 00:26 +0200
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-11 19:30 -1000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-08 03:42 +0200
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-10-08 02:46 -0500
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-09 00:43 +0200
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Marc Olschok <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2014-10-11 23:32 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-28 18:45 +0000
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-25 09:22 +0200
                Re: Typing, was [Re: Metrics on stack usage] Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-28 17:09 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-25 01:43 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 01:15 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-25 10:19 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 01:06 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 04:25 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 03:15 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 14:43 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-25 22:23 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-29 13:42 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-29 14:23 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-29 10:14 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-29 17:10 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-29 12:31 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-29 21:07 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-05 01:34 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-10-05 03:29 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-05 13:46 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-05 15:49 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-06 03:44 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-06 00:12 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-05 18:56 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-06 01:34 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-06 19:57 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-07 04:49 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-07 16:21 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-08 05:43 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-09 02:35 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-08 21:48 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-10 05:03 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-10 01:07 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-10 21:27 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-11 00:01 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-10 19:59 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-11 03:33 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-10 22:30 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-11 15:22 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-11 22:24 -0400
                Loading libraries (was: Metrics on stack usage) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-10-11 09:23 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-10 16:11 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-10 16:36 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-10 22:38 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-17 23:39 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-10-11 12:25 +0100
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-10-07 07:52 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 00:34 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-01 23:26 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-01 16:15 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-01 21:57 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-02 01:20 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-02 15:59 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-10-02 19:29 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-10-03 15:03 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-10-05 02:27 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-10-05 09:22 +0100
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-23 19:36 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-24 13:40 -0700
  Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-16 17:06 +0000
  Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-16 07:43 -1000
    Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-16 15:04 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-16 09:34 -1000
        Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-17 17:30 -0400
          Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-17 12:42 -1000
            Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-18 11:33 +0000
              Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-18 11:53 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 01:14 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-19 03:32 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-19 12:41 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-19 12:14 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-20 15:41 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage mhx@iae.nl - 2014-09-19 12:31 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-21 12:59 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-19 12:05 +0000
              Re: Metrics on stack usage Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@notthis.hetnet.nl> - 2014-09-21 07:44 +0200
  Re: Metrics on stack usage Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2014-09-17 11:10 +0200
  Re: Metrics on stack usage stephen@mpeforth.com - 2014-09-17 14:20 -0700
    Re: Metrics on stack usage Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-09-17 17:41 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-17 16:44 -0700
        Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-18 10:26 +0000
          Re: Metrics on stack usage Celeros <kerneels@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 00:12 +0200
            Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 19:15 -0400
            Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-18 17:14 -0700
              Re: Metrics on stack usage stephen@mpeforth.com - 2014-09-19 02:59 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-19 12:20 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage stephen@mpeforth.com - 2014-09-20 09:04 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-29 18:08 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-09-30 04:33 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-01 19:30 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-30 11:24 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-09-30 10:55 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-09-30 18:39 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-10-01 01:44 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-10-01 03:57 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-01 18:45 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-10-02 07:53 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage G Smith <do.not.use@tectimco.com> - 2014-10-02 13:22 +0100
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-10-02 08:36 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-10-02 15:34 -0700
            Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-19 12:08 +0000
              Re: Metrics on stack usage "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-09-19 18:58 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-09-19 13:28 -1000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage "Rod Pemberton" <buzzoff@nonamewhichexists.cmm> - 2014-09-19 19:57 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-21 13:09 +0000
              Re: Metrics on stack usage Celeros <kerneels@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 13:27 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 08:04 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-20 08:55 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 15:01 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-20 17:34 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 19:15 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-21 03:34 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 06:57 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-21 07:31 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 18:04 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-21 15:17 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 18:49 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-21 15:57 -0700
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 19:47 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-22 02:58 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 05:28 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-09-21 11:24 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 07:55 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2014-09-20 14:57 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-20 15:22 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-09-20 15:25 +0000
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 15:08 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-20 17:38 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 19:19 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-09-21 03:35 -0500
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 07:00 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Celeros <kerneels@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 08:54 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 03:26 -0400
                Re: Metrics on stack usage Celeros <kerneels@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 10:03 +0200
                Re: Metrics on stack usage rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 05:29 -0400
      Re: Metrics on stack usage stephen@mpeforth.com - 2014-09-19 02:53 -0700

csiph-web